IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
- Apr 05 2006
- Apr 05 2006
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., John C Klensin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., John C Klensin
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Paul Hoffman
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., John Calcote
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., John C Klensin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., John C Klensin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Joe Abley
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Joe Abley
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, David R Oran
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
- Syslog inquiry, TAG delimiters., Johan Bosaeus
- Apr 04 2006
- Apr 03 2006
- Apr 01 2006
- Apr 01 2006
- Mar 31 2006
- RE: Don't feed the trolls, Soliman, Hesham
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Peter Sherbin
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Dave Crocker
- RE: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Francois Menard
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Dave Cridland
- Don't feed the trolls, Pekka Savola
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Christian Huitema
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Theodore Ts'o
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: PI space (was: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them), Noel Chiappa
- RE: PI space (was: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them), Michel Py
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Stephen Sprunk
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Stephen Sprunk
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Stephen Sprunk
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Mar 30 2006
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Austin Schutz
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., John C Klensin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., John C Klensin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Peter Dambier
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Austin Schutz
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Austin Schutz
- RE: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Peter Sherbin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., John C Klensin
- OT: Japanese addresses (was: 128 bits should be enough for everyone), Dave Aronson (re IETF)
- RE: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:, Steve Silverman
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Tim Chown
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Eliot Lear
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Andrew McGregor
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, YAO Jiankang
- RE: Making IETF happening in different regions, Yaakov Stein
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: PI space (was: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them), Stephen Sprunk
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: Why DNS sucks for referrals (was Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Francois D. Menard
- Mar 29 2006
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Ray Pelletier
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Dave Cridland
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Tim Chown
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Iljitsch van Beijnum
- PI space (was: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them), Noel Chiappa
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Why DNS sucks for referrals (was Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Keith Moore
- Re: Why DNS sucks for referrals (was Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Peter Dambier
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- Re: Why DNS sucks for referrals (was Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Francois Menard
- Why DNS sucks for referrals (was Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Scott W Brim
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Julien Laganier
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Scott Leibrand
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", bmanning
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Julien Laganier
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Carl Malamud
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Dave Cridland
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re:StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Brett Thorson
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Tony Hain
- Mar 28 2006
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Thomas Narten
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Mark Andrews
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Fortenberry, Thaddeus
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Noel Chiappa
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, kent crispin
- RE: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re:StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Austin Schutz
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Austin Schutz
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Markku Savela
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Marshall Eubanks
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Keith Moore
- RE: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: StupidNAT tricks and how to stop them.), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Fleischman, Eric
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Noel Chiappa
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Scott Leibrand
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Scott Leibrand
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- RE: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Anthony G. Atkielski
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Gray, Eric
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Noel Chiappa
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Andy Bierman
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Fleischman, Eric
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Stewart Bryant
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Scott Leibrand
- [no subject], Unknown
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Scott Leibrand
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Scott W Brim
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Jeroen Massar
- RE: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Steve Silverman
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Gray, Eric
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Spencer Dawkins
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Noel Chiappa
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Noel Chiappa
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Dave Crocker
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Noel Chiappa
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Noel Chiappa
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, bmanning
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Cyrus Daboo
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, bmanning
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", bmanning
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, bmanning
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Noel Chiappa
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Tim Chown
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Dave Cridland
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Austin Schutz
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Jeroen Massar
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Artur Hecker
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Tim Chown
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Leslie Daigle
- Re: IETF Social/Way-back machine presentation available online?, Susan Estrada
- Mar 27 2006
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Austin Schutz
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- IETF Social/Way-back machine presentation available online?, Spencer Dawkins
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Dave Cridland
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- IPv6 vs. Stupid NAT tricks: false dichotomy? (Was: Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.), Scott Leibrand
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Austin Schutz
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Scott Leibrand
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Dave Aronson (re IETF)
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- RE: the iab & net neutrality, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Meeting format (Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Andy Bierman
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Keith Moore
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Michel Py
- Re: technical tutorials (was: RE: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Spencer Dawkins
- Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: technical tutorials, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Meeting format (Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Meeting format (Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Dave Crocker
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Scott W Brim
- Re: 2 hour meetings, John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Tim Chown
- Re: Meeting format (Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Andy Bierman
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Dave Crocker
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Edward Lewis
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Melinda Shore
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Brian E Carpenter
- Re: technical tutorials, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Dave Crocker
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: 'PANA Framework' to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola
- Re: Meeting format (Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Brian E Carpenter
- Mar 26 2006
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Melinda Shore
- Re: technical tutorials (was: RE: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), John C Klensin
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Joel Jaeggli
- technical tutorials (was: RE: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Tim Chown
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Michael Thomas
- Mar 25 2006
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Bill Fenner
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Bill Fenner
- Re: 2 hour meetings, John C Klensin
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Dave Crocker
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Andy Bierman
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Geoff Huston
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Joel M. Halpern
- Re: 2 hour meetings, John C Klensin
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Edward Lewis
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues, John C Klensin
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Andy Bierman
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in different regions), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Brian E Carpenter
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, John C Klensin
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Andy Bierman
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Edward Lewis
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Patrik Fältström
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Carl Malamud
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Stig Venaas
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Ray Plzak
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Yangwoo Ko
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), john . loughney
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Marshall Eubanks
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Scott W Brim
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Geoff Huston
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Scott W Brim
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Brian E Carpenter
- Mar 24 2006
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Glenn Parsons
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Ned Freed
- Draft notes from Wednesday plenary, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Keith Moore
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Scott Bradner
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Dave Cridland
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Keith Moore
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Dave Cridland
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Randy Presuhn
- RE: the iab & net neutrality, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Meeting format (Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Andy Bierman
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Andrew McGregor
- Re: Jabber chats, Jari Arkko
- are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors), Keith Moore
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Joe Touch
- RE: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in differentregions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Tim Chown
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Scott Leibrand
- RE: the iab & net neutrality, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in differentregions), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Stig Venaas
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Tim Chown
- RE: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in differentregions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Tim Chown
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Dave Crocker
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Dave Cridland
- Re: Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in different regions), Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Simon Josefsson
- RE: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Gray, Eric
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Keith Moore
- Re: Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in different regions), Dave Crocker
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Dave Crocker
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Tony Hansen
- RE: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Yu-Shun Wang
- Jabber chats (was: 2 hour meetings), Michael Thomas
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Simon Josefsson
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Joe Touch
- Meeting format (Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in different regions), Keith Moore
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Ned Freed
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Keith Moore
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Andy Bierman
- Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates, Ray Pelletier
- Re: Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in different regions), Dave Crocker
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Eliot Lear
- Re: 2 hour meetings, Dave Cridland
- Sponsors and influence (Re: Making IETF happening in different regions), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Marshall Eubanks
- Update: Problems with OrangeWare Mac 802.11a driver solved (was Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF), Pekka Nikander
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Noel Chiappa
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Tim Chown
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Tim Chown
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Ray Pelletier
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Ray Pelletier
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Andy Bierman
- 2 hour meetings, Keith Moore
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Andy Bierman
- RE: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Noel Chiappa
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Marshall Eubanks
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Marshall Eubanks
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, John C Klensin
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", David Kessens
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Keith Moore
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Stuart Cheshire
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Ken Raeburn
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Terry Gray
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, David Harrington
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Joe Touch
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Joe Touch
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Joe Touch
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Joe Touch
- Re: the iab & net neutrality, Henning Schulzrinne
- An absolutely fantastic wireless IETF, Harald Alvestrand
- RE: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, DENG, HUI -HCHBJ
- Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Andy Bierman
- the iab & net neutrality, Tony Hain
- Re: Appeal of AD Decision to uphold Atompub ban, Brian E Carpenter
- About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Keith Moore
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, David Kessens
- Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors", Dave Crocker
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, David Kessens
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Ole Jacobsen
- Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, Ned Freed
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Keith Moore
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Keith Moore
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Michael StJohns
- About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, Keith Moore
- Re: Making IETF happening in different regions, David Kessens
- Making IETF happening in different regions, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Mar 23 2006
- IETF65 Network on Friday, Bob Hinden
- Lost Windbreaker, Ben Campbell
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, John Leslie
- IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Thursday, Susan Estrada
- RE: Meeting Venue - Breakfast Ran Out, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Meeting Venue - Breakfast Ran Out, Eric Rescorla
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues, Scott W Brim
- RE: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Nokia 770?, Joel Jaeggli
- Mar 22 2006
- Re: Nokia 770?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues, Sam Hartman
- RE: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06, Alper Yegin
- RE: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues, Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Nokia 770?, Dave Cridland
- Re: Nokia 770?, Carsten Bormann
- Nokia 770?, Tim Chown
- Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues, Sam Hartman
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Ross Finlayson
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06, Bob O'Hara \(boohara\)
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Appeal of AD Decision to uphold Atompub ban, Robert Sayre
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06, Alper Yegin
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Scott W Brim
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Russ Housley
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, James Galvin
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Stephen Casner
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Carsten Bormann
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Pasi.Eronen
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Ole Jacobsen
- IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Wednesday, Susan Estrada
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Russ Housley
- RE: [Pana] Last Call: 'PANA Framework' to Informational RFC, Bob O'Hara \(boohara\)
- RE: Have You Attended 50 or More IETF Meetings?, Tony Hain
- Mar 21 2006
- Re: Have You Attended 50 or More IETF Meetings?, John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06, Yoshihiro Ohba
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Peter Dambier
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Stefan Santesson
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06, Sam Hartman
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Simon Leinen
- Meeting Venue - Breakfast Ran Out, James Rafferty
- IETF at 20 Guerilla Party Events for Tuesday, Susan Estrada
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06, Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: Anatole in-room net confusion, Scott W Brim
- Have You Attended 50 or More IETF Meetings?, Susan Estrada
- Re: Anatole in-room net confusion, Ray Pelletier
- Re: Anatole in-room net confusion, Ray Pelletier
- Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06, Russ Housley
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- RE: Anatole in-room net confusion, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: Anatole in-room net confusion, Scott Leibrand
- Anatole in-room net confusion, Sam Weiler
- RE: LAST NomCom Announcement: IAB Call for Nominations, Ed Juskevicius
- LAST NomCom Announcement: IAB Call for Nominations, Ralph Droms
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Brian E Carpenter
- Mar 20 2006
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment, Stefan Santesson
- Re: v6 on the net in Dallas, Jim Martin
- Re: v6 on the net in Dallas, Tim Chown
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Ned Freed
- v6 on the net in Dallas, Jim Martin
- RE: The original specs and notes on them....., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Peter Dambier
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Peter Dambier
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley
- RE: Guidance needed on well known ports, McDonald, Ira
Mail converted by MHonArc