IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• May 07 2004
• Re: Problem of blocking ICMP packets, Mark Smith
• May 07 2004
• Re: Problem of blocking ICMP packets, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Problem of blocking ICMP packets, Masataka Ohta
• RE: Problem of blocking ICMP packets, Christian Huitema
• Re: [Sip] NOTIFY on call transfer procedure, Robert Sparks
• force to load models, TABAKIS, ELEAS (AIT)
• Re: Please note this update: IETF mission statement, jfcm
• Problem of blocking ICMP packets, Rajat
• [Sip] NOTIFY on call transfer procedure, Thomas Ackermann
• Scope Issue, Girish Kamath
• May 05 2004
• no degree, no problem, Seth Foley
• May 04 2004
• 36? Turn your opinion into cash, Mohammed Mayfield
• May 04 2004
• efforts involving entering a symmetrical relationship with the computer and programs.[34] People would have to learn to use the tools utilized by the computer and Cyberspace in a different way than ascribed by Îoff the shelfÌ programs. This is something I, Pierre Landry
• [Fwd: 0. General - UPDATE on "FCC soliciting comments on mobile spam"], Yakov Shafranovich
• May 03 2004
• Re: Please note this update: IETF mission statement, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Please note this update: IETF mission statement, Susan Harris
• Re: Please note this update: IETF mission statement, jfcm
• Re: Please note this update: IETF mission statement, Mark Smith
• Re: Please note this update: IETF mission statement, John Leslie
• Re: Please note this update: IETF mission statement, Mark Smith
• Please note this update: IETF mission statement, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• The last theorist encountered was Sherry Turkle and her notion of a post-modern culture of simulation, Joel Sterling
• May 02 2004
• which claimed to be a complete mathematical system. What Gñdel showed in more understandable words were, Jeff Farley
• university degrees for sale here, Mariana Hendrickson
• May 01 2004
• isi.edu mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
• ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
• Apr 30 2004
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, jfcm
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, John C Klensin
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, jfcm
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Tim Chown
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Scott Bradner
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Scott W Brim
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, John C Klensin
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, John C Klensin
• [Ietf] TLDs a thing not to do, Dan Kolis
• Fwd: Save 40%-90% on Hundreds of Prescription Drugs. Discreetly Shipped Overnight., Martina Bowen
• RE: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Tony Hain
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Karl Auerbach
• Apr 29 2004
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Rick Wesson
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Tim Chown
• RE: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Tony Hain
• RE: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Peter Ford
• [Ietf] Last call comment on 'AES Encryption for Kerberos 5', Simon Josefsson
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Aki Niemi
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Dean Anderson
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Bill Manning
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Steven M. Bellovin
• university degrees for sale!, Hazel Rhodes
• auction hints, auction tips, online auction home business, auction tool, Kristin Todd
• Apr 28 2004
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, jfcm
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Markus Stumpf
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Stephen Sprunk
• Apr 27 2004
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Dean Anderson
• [Ietf] SIP Stack start off, Vishal Agarwal
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Stephen Sprunk
• Apr 26 2004
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Markus Stumpf
• Apr 24 2004
• Re: Get Any Pills. Our Doctors Write Prescriptions. Overnight FedEx. Secure. Discreet, Camille Hooks
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, jfcm
• [Ietf] Delivery Error (ietf at ietf.org), paf
• Apr 23 2004
• get ready to shape up your riches w/ online auction, Nadia Hartley
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Markus Stumpf
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Joe Abley
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Michel Py
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Daniel Senie
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, jfcm
• Re: [Ietf] RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Tony Hain
• [Ietf] RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt, Michel Py
• Apr 22 2004
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Dean Anderson
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Dean Anderson
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Dean Anderson
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Tony Hain
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Tony Hain
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Dean Anderson
• Re: Ambien sleep med, Michael Riddle
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, jfcm
• Apr 21 2004
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Fred Templin
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Dean Anderson
• Re: [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, John C Klensin
• [Ietf] New .mobi, .xxx, ... TLDs?, Tim Chown
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Dean Anderson
• [Ietf] Mail Delivery (failure ietf at ietf.org), cabo
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Michel Py
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Bob Hinden
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Tony Hain
• Apr 20 2004
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Geoff Huston
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Dean Anderson
• RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Tony Hain
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Geoff Huston
• Re: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Mark Smith
• [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• can you help your customers 24/7?, Debbie Hahn
• Apr 18 2004
• Fwd: Lose Weight Easy! Prescription Medications from USA ..., Jeanine Reyna
• I wish I could find better work, Sterling Joiner
• Apr 18 2004
• [Ietf] Re: information, presnick
• Apr 17 2004
• [Ietf] Mail Delivery (failure ietf at ietf.org), gih
• Re: I appreciate it, Dean Hartley
• Apr 16 2004
• Call me, Daisy Reagan
• Apr 15 2004
• Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-auth-mech-03.txt, Alexandru Petrescu
• Buy Cheap Prescription Drugs Online, Josefa Blair
• Apr 14 2004
• good stuff, Kimberley Chatman
• [iesg-secretary #27895] My details (Autoreply), Support Online
• Apr 13 2004
• Fw: Pastdue Account, Omolayo Gurule
• alMatrixTopNSourceAddress value, chintan sheth
• Final version, dee3
• IESG review of RFC Editor documents - take 2, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Apr 12 2004
• RE: Patents? we don't need no stinking Patents!, Eric Burger
• Delivery Failure (ietf at ietf.org), lyong
• Apr 09 2004
• Re: Protected Mail Request, agenda
• Apr 08 2004
• Urgent, Refill Your Prescription Now, Carey Riddle
• Apr 07 2004
• incomprehensible list filtering, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• stolen, kzm
• Apr 06 2004
• ADV: Attention All Nonprofit Orgs: (Members, Staff and Associates):, Admin
• hello, shahram_davari
• Delivered Message (ietf at ietf.org), hinden
• Apr 05 2004
• Re: Extended Mail, erosen
• Re: Patents? we don't need no stinking Patents!, Dean Anderson
• Apr 03 2004
• Get all meds here. Any Pills You Want. No prescription. Discreet. Secure, Minerva Friedman
• Purchase Prescription Medication Here Without Any Prescription. Discreet. Secure., Ora Wang
• Delivery Failure (ietf at ietf.org), jkrey
• Mail Delivery (failure ietf at ietf.org), yakov
• ^_^ mew-mew (-:, casner
• Apr 02 2004
• Learn how to make big profits with Google kzbktfksbcbiwh, Charlie Estrada
• Patents? we don't need no stinking Patents!, Dan Kolis
• Re: Creation of an I-D-Announce Mailing List, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Subdomain Patent Sparks Concerns, Dean Anderson
• Re: Creation of an I-D-Announce Mailing List, Pekka Savola
• Changes to IETF-announce - archive missing?, Graham Klyne
• Best Online Drugstore Delivers ANY Meds Overnight. Discreetly. Securely., Nina Price
• notification, smb
• what's up?, kzm
• Apr 01 2004
• ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
• isi.edu mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
• information, mallman
• Mar 31 2004
• This is different, Bryant Youngblood
• For amusement value only, Joe Abley
• fake, presnick
• Re: Subdomain Patent Sparks Concerns, Anthony G. Atkielski
• Mar 30 2004
• Subdomain Patent Sparks Concerns, Einar Stefferud
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Paul Hoffman / VPNC
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Paul Hoffman / VPNC
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Keith Moore
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Mar 29 2004
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), jfcm
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Joe Touch
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shore-nat-reachability-00.txt, Melinda Shore
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, James Seng
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), David Morris
• over 200 million times a day, people use Google, Donnell Franks
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shore-nat-reachability-00.txt, Pekka Savola
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Donald Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Spencer Dawkins
• Good news, Felix, Zhang
• Mar 28 2004
• RE: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Dassa
• RE: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Peter Ford
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, John Loughney
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Paul Vixie
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Here's a new twist on Affiliate programs, Lucile Emery
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), James Seng
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), grenville armitage
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Paul Hoffman / VPNC
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), James Seng
• Mar 27 2004
• Re: Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Scott Bradner
• Naming crap (Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, James Seng
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Eliot Lear
• RE: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Marge
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Scott W Brim
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Noel Chiappa
• dear, swallow
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Unicode Consortium Public Review 32 and 33, Patrik Fältström
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Keith Moore
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Scott Bradner
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Eliot Lear
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Keith Moore
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, John C Klensin
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Keith Moore
• Mar 26 2004
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Keith Moore
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Eliot Lear
• Comments regarding draft-iesg-rfced-documents-00.txt, Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Pete Resnick
• IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Keith Moore
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, John C Klensin
• Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Susan Harris
• IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Creation of an I-D-Announce Mailing List, J.P. Martin-Flatin
• Hello, jaltman
• ADV: Attention All School Staff, Teachers and Students:, Admin
• Mar 24 2004
• Unicode Consortium Review: 29 Normalization Issue (Closes 2004.06.08), Patrik Fältström
• Unicode Consortium Review: 31 Cantonese Romanization 2004.06.08, Patrik Fältström
• Re: callplot tool for generating call flows, Felix, Zhang
• RE: callplot tool for generating call flows, Jeroen Massar
• Re: callplot tool for generating call flows, Ross Finlayson
• Re: callplot tool for generating call flows, Felix, Zhang
• Re: callplot tool for generating call flows, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Mar 24 2004
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types (was: Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement) (FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-ip-service-terms-00.txt), jfcm
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types, jfcm
• Fwd: Order All Medications online with no prior prescription. Discreet Shipping., Nichole Hunt
• information, jon . peterson
• Mar 23 2004
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types, John C Klensin
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types, Vernon Schryver
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types, Vernon Schryver
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en esp añolde los Estatutos delICANN, jfcm
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos delICANN, Dave Aronson
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos delICANN, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Multiple I-Ds (Was: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-uruena-xsdf-overview-00.txt), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types (was: Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement) (FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-ip-service-terms-00.txt), Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Draft-klensin-process-july14-01.txt., Spencer Dawkins
• Users can not hear each other - Netmeeting NAT Voip GW, lixin chen
• Multiple I-Ds (Was: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-uruena-xsdf-overview-00.txt), Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Promote someone else's online business and cash in big, Valarie Seay
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos delICANN, Jeff Williams
• Mar 22 2004
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Scott Michel
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Scott Michel
• [iesg-secretary #23499] Extended Mail (Autoreply), Support Online
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types (was: Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement) (FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-ip-service-terms-00.txt), John C Klensin
• Re: The madness continues, Robert G. Brown
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos delICANN, Dave Aronson
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos delICANN, Dave Aronson
• Re: The madness continues, Nathaniel Borenstein
• The madness continues, Spencer Dawkins
• Mar 21 2004
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: Private message from John Klensin, James Seng
• Re: Document, ole
• Mar 20 2004
• your body?, jwn2
• mthis poll is vital for youh answerai, June Drake
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types, Vernon Schryver
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types (FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-ip-service-terms-00.txt), Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types (was: Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement) (FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-ip-service-terms-00.txt), Vernon Schryver
• Mar 19 2004
• Re: GRE and L2TP, W. Mark Townsley
• Re: GRE and L2TP, Stewart Bryant
• Re: Private message from John Klensin, Dean Anderson
• Re: Msg reply, cook
• RE: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Fleischman, Eric
• Re: L2TP Deployment Scenario?, W. Mark Townsley
• Re: Private message from John Klensin, James Seng
• L2TP Deployment Scenario?, Rohit Gupta
• Mar 18 2004
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Dean Anderson
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Paul Vixie
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: GRE and L2TP, W. Mark Townsley
• Categorization of TCP/IP service provision types (was: Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement) (FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-ip-service-terms-00.txt), John C Klensin
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• callplot tool for generating call flows, Jonathan Rosenberg
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, jfcm
• Re: Hello, ramku . sankar
• RE: Text message, harald
• RE: Protected message, ramku . sankar
• Re: Incoming Fax, ramku . sankar
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", william(at)elan.net
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Paul Vixie
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Yakov Shafranovich
• GRE and L2TP, Rohit Gupta
• IETF 59 Plenary Meeting Minutes, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement" REALITY CHECK TIME, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Mar 17 2004
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Vernon Schryver
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Robert G. Brown
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Robert G. Brown
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Doug Royer
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Paul Vixie
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Dean Anderson
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Vernon Schryver
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Robert G. Brown
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Charles E. Perkins
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Robert G. Brown
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", John Leslie
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Dean Anderson
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Eric A. Hall
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Paul Vixie
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Ed Gerck
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Eric A. Hall
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Vernon Schryver
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Paul Vixie
• Re: "Principles" of "Spam-abatement", Dave Crocker
• RE: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Christian Huitema
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos delICANN, Jeff Williams
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Robert G. Brown
• Welcome to DRIS discussion list!, wang liang
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Scott Michel
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Stephen Sprunk
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Scott Michel
• Mar 16 2004
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Eric A. Hall
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Doug Royer
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos delICANN, Dave Aronson
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, jfcm
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos delICANN, Jeff Williams
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Mar 15 2004
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Scott Michel
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Scott Michel
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Tom Lord
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF List broken, Dean Anderson
• Re: Community Collaboration, versus Central Management, Yakov Rekhter
• Re: IETF List broken, Dave Aronson
• Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: IETF List broken, Nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos del ICANN, Dave Aronson
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, jfcm
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Robert G. Brown
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Your document, k13
• Mar 14 2004
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement (fwd), Dean Anderson
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Vernon Schryver
• [no subject], diamond
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Vernon Schryver
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Eliot Lear
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Vernon Schryver
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Mike S
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• The right to refuse, was: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Einar Stefferud
• Re: IETF List broken, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• move to second stage, Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement (fwd), Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Scott Michel
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Jeff Williams
• Mar 13 2004
• Re: IETF List broken, Dean Anderson
• IETF List broken, Dean Anderson
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement (fwd), Dean Anderson
• Re: Is this really necessary?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Is this really necessary?, Anthony G. Atkielski
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Paul Vixie
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), John C Klensin
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Donald Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Anthony G. Atkielski
• DARPA get's it right this time, takes aim at IT sacred cows, Jeff Williams
• Re: Apologies for the irony (was Re: Principles of Spam-abatement), Tom Lord
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dr. Jeffrey Race
• Re: Apologies for the irony (was Re: Principles of Spam-abatement), Paul Vixie
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Paul Vixie
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dave Crocker
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dave Crocker
• [Fwd: [Ham-Linux] Be careful what you say], Doug Royer
• Re: [Fwd: [Ham-Linux] Be careful what you say], Doug Royer
• Online Meds, Willis Jackson
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Keith Moore
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Paul Vixie
• Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos del ICANN, Jeff Williams
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement (fwd), Dean Anderson
• Mar 12 2004
• Re: Apologies for the irony (was Re: Principles of Spam-abatement), Vernon Schryver
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Apologies for the irony (was Re: Principles of Spam-abatement), Nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Vernon Schryver
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Paul Vixie
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Alan Barrett
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Vernon Schryver
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Vernon Schryver
• Online Pharmacy - Lowest Prices - Prozac and More! ..., Lorenzo Burch
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), John C Klensin
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Vernon Schryver
• PORT, kutch ariola
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, John Stracke
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, John C Klensin
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Vernon Schryver
• Re: Who can do me a faver to send me the latest version of RFC2916bis?, Felix, Zhang
• RE: Who can do me a faver to send me the latest version of RFC2916bis?, Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: Who can do me a faver to send me the latest version of RFC2916bis?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Who can do me a faver to send me the latest version of RFC2916bis?, Felix, Zhang
• Mar 11 2004
• Re: Continuing the story - another stab at an IETF mission statement, Robert G. Brown
• Re: Continuing the story - another stab at an IETF missionstatement, Tom Petch
• Re: Continuing the story - another stab at an IETF mission statement, Einar Stefferud
• Re: Question for the DNS system., Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Question for the DNS system., Zhang Bao Feng
• Mar 10 2004
• Re: Question for the DNS system., Donald Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Joe Abley
• Re: Continuing the story - another stab at an IETF mission statement, Robert G. Brown
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Dean Anderson
• Re: Question for the DNS system., James Seng
• Re: Continuing the story - another stab at an IETF mission statement, Einar Stefferud
• Question for the DNS system., Felix, Zhang
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Continuing the story - another stab at an IETF mission, Paul Vixie
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Randy Presuhn
• Re: Continuing the story - another stab at an IETF mission statement, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Mar 09 2004
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Rick Stewart
• Re: paralysis, Dean Anderson
• Mar 08 2004
• Re: paralysis, John Leslie
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Dave Crocker
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Graham Klyne
• Plenary slides on multihoming and ID/locator separation, Erik Nordmark
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Keith Moore
• Re: paralysis, Robert G. Brown
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Dave Crocker
• :), jmorris
• Re: paralysis, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• RE: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Eric Burger
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: paralysis, Vernon Schryver
• Re: paralysis, Paul Hoffman / IMC
• Mar 07 2004
• Re: paralysis, Dave Crocker
• Re: paralysis, Michael Thomas
• hi, eamon . otuathail
• Re: Proposal For Token-Based Authentication In Mail Submission As Anti-Forgery Effort, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Spencer Dawkins
• Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Proposal For Token-Based Authentication In Mail Submission As Anti-Forgery Effort, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Mar 06 2004
• Re: paralysis, Paul Hoffman / IMC
• Re: paralysis, Vernon Schryver
• paralysis, Michael Thomas
• Mailing list created for IETF broadcast issue., Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Proposal For Token-Based Authentication In Mail Submission As Anti-Forgery Effort, Vernon Schryver
• Re: MBONE access?, Paul Vixie
• Proposal For Token-Based Authentication In Mail Submission As Anti-Forgery Effort, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: MBONE access?, James Seng
• Mar 05 2004
• Re: UA 893 compensation, Stephen Kent
• Re: UA 893 compensation, John C Klensin
• UA 893 compensation, Stephen Kent
• Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection, Sam Hartman
• Re: stolen, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• stolen, randy
• Mar 04 2004
• IETF59 Lost a Jacket?, Woohyong Choi
• Re: MBONE access?, Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Multicast access, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Principles of Spam-abatement, Ed Gerck
• Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection, Eliot Lear
• Re: MBONE access?, ned . freed
• Re: Multicast access, Kevin C. Almeroth
• RE: On supporting NAT, was: Re: MBONE access?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: On supporting NAT, was: Re: MBONE access?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: MBONE access?, Daniel Senie
• RE: Perimeter security (was: MBONE access?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip