IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Aug 26 2005
• Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle
• RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Rob Austein
• Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
• Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle
• RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
• Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
• Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Bill Manning
• Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman
• RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Russ Allbery
• RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• DKIM, Keith Moore
• Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Mark Baugher
• Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Keith Moore
• Re: DKIM, Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Mark Baugher
• (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, wayne
• Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Ian Jackson
• Re: [Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful], Iljitsch van Beijnum