IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]

Aug 27 2002

Need Info Urgently, Chandrashekar Reddy Challagonda

Aug 27 2002

Next I-D submission deadline?, Bryan Ng
RE: am i the only one..., Glen Zorn

Aug 26 2002

Re: am i the only one..., Eliot Lear

Aug 23 2002

Re: Nomcom call for volunteers, Michael Richardson
Nomcom call for volunteers, Phil Roberts
IP over MPEG-2 Transport, Dr G Fairhurst
Re: RFC2627, Harald Alvestrand
Warning: Material considered inappropriate for IETF list, Harald Alvestrand

Aug 22 2002

Re: am i the only one..., James M Galvin
IP over MPEG-2 Transport, Narayan, Krishnan
Re: am i the only one..., Steve Coya
Re: am i the only one..., Dominic Pinto
Re: am i the only one..., Bill Manning
Re: MUST/SHOULD and related terminology, C. M. Heard
Re: am i the only one..., mstjohns
Re: am i the only one..., Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: am i the only one..., Stephen Sprunk
Re: am i the only one..., Donald Eastlake 3rd
Re: am i the only one..., Robert Elz
Re: am i the only one..., Ian Cooper
Re: am i the only one..., Eliot Lear
Re: am i the only one..., Pekka Savola
am i the only one..., Eliot Lear

Aug 21 2002

RE: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, Franck Martin
Re: MUST/SHOULD and related terminology, Fred Baker
Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, Keith Moore
MUST/SHOULD and related terminology, Martin Duerst
RE: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, Franck Martin
smtpng, Bill Cunningham
Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, John C Klensin
Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, John C Klensin
Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, william
Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, Dave Crocker
3:219 INFO....Mirrored Registry, Jim Fleming

Aug 20 2002

Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, william
Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, Valdis . Kletnieks
SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, william
RE: writing congress about spam, Dan Wing
Re: writing congress about spam, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Why spam is a problem, Greg Skinner
Re: writing congress about spam, Fred Baker
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Eric A. Hall
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Why Spam is a problem, David Morris
0:190 ORG.....32-bit DNS "Mirrored Registries", Jim Fleming
Re: One SPAM side effect, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Einar Stefferud
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Eric A. Hall
Re: writing congress about spam, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: writing congress about spam, Richard Shockey
Re: Spam, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Spam, James Seng
More on UCE, James Seng
Spam, Bill Cunningham
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Eric A. Hall
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Larry Smith
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Donald Eastlake 3rd
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Claus Färber

Aug 19 2002

Re: bandwidth, Joel Jaeggli
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Joe Baptista
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Joe Baptista
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Vernon Schryver
Re: writing congress about spam, Dan Wing
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Vernon Schryver
Private Reply to Fred Baker... My Apology, Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why spam is a problem., John C Klensin
Re: Why spam is a problem., Fred Baker
Re: Heartbeat between Router and 3rd party box, Fred Baker
Re: Why spam is a problem., John Stracke
Re: Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act, Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why Spam is a problem, John Stracke
Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker
Re[2]: Why Spam is a problem, Richard Welty
RE: bandwidth, TOMSON ERIC
Re: Why spam is a problem., Brian Bisaillon
What does a /8 Lease For ?, Jim Fleming
Re: Why Spam is a problem, John Stracke
Re: Heartbeat between Router and 3rd party box, Vernon Schryver
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Vernon Schryver
Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act, Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Henning Schulzrinne
Re: Heartbeat between Router and 3rd party box, Fred Baker
Re: Why Spam is a problem, John Stracke
Re: Why Spam is a problem, John Stracke
Re: Why Spam is a problem, John Stracke
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Donald Eastlake 3rd
RE: bandwidth, Edward Lewis
RE: bandwidth, TOMSON ERIC
RE: bandwidth, TOMSON ERIC
Re: on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Jan Meijer
Re: bandwidth, Bill Cunningham
on UCE: Possible Interest (fwd), Rick Wesson
Re: bandwidth, Benny Nasution
bandwidth, Bill Cunningham

Aug 18 2002

Heartbeat between Router and 3rd party box, Voreniza S
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Claus Färber

Aug 17 2002

Re: writing congress about spam, Doug
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker
Re: Why spam is a problem., SRIMURUGIAN KOTIESWARAN
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Fred Baker
Re: Why spam is a problem., Bill Cunningham
writing congress about spam, Eliot Lear
What does a /8 Lease For ?, Jim Fleming
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Anthony Atkielski
Re: Why spam is a problem., Jacob Palme
Re: Why spam is a problem., Jacob Palme
"...IETF meetings should continue to be the main venue..." ??, Jim Fleming

Aug 16 2002

Re: Why Spam is a problem, Fred Baker
Re: Why Spam is a problem, stanislav shalunov
Re: One SPAM side effect, Dave Crocker
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Dave Crocker
Re: One SPAM side effect, Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why Spam is a problem, John Stracke
Re: Why Spam is a problem, stanislav shalunov
Re: One SPAM side effect, Aaron Falk
Re: One SPAM side effect, Randy Bush
One SPAM side effect, Bob Braden
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Keith Moore
Re: Why Spam is a problem, John Stracke
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Alex Audu
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why Spam is a problem, stanislav shalunov
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Frank Solensky
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Keith Moore
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Doug Royer
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Bill Cunningham
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Einar Stefferud
Re[2]: Why Spam is a problem, Richard Welty
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Vernon Schryver
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Fred Baker
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Keith Moore
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Perry E. Metzger
Why Spam is a Problem, Bill Cunningham
Re[2]: Why Spam is a problem, Richard Welty
RE: Why Spam is a problem, Gream, Matthew
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Bill Cunningham
Re[2]: Why Spam is a problem, Richard Welty
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Einar Stefferud
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Eric A. Hall
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Anthony Atkielski
Re: Why Spam is a problem, John C Klensin
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Eric A. Hall

Aug 15 2002

Re: Why Spam is a problem, Eric A. Hall
Re[2]: Why Spam is a problem, Richard Welty
Why spam is a problem, Bill Cunningham
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Fred Baker
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., stanislav shalunov
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Eric A. Hall
Re: Why spam is a problem., kent
Re: Why spam is a problem., John Stracke
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", Jim Fleming
Re: Why spam is a problem., stanislav shalunov
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Keith Moore
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Jan Meijer
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Claus Färber
Re[2]: Why Spam is a problem, Richard Welty
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Bruce Campbell
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Perry E. Metzger
RE: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Dave Crocker
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Andrew Rutherford
Re: Why spam is a problem., Pekka Savola
Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", todd glassey
Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", Donald Eastlake 3rd
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Einar Stefferud
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Theodore Ts'o

Aug 14 2002

Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Paul Hoffman / IMC
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Bill Cunningham
RE: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Joe Baptista
RE: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Einar Stefferud
[FROM CYBERIA] ICANN Reform suggestions by Markle Foundation, Joe Baptista
Re: Why spam is a problem., stanislav shalunov
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Gary E. Miller
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Peter Deutsch
Re: Why spam is a problem., Theodore Ts'o
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Bill Cunningham
Re: Why spam is a problem., stanislav shalunov
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Theodore Ts'o
CALL FOR PAPERS - SAC2003, Turgay Korkmaz
RE: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Daniel Senie
RE: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Ted Gavin
Re: Why spam is a problem., Brian Bisaillon
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
IP"NG" and IPv6 are not the same thing...., Jim Fleming
Does this mean that the CISCO private jets do not have 24x7 Internet ?, Jim Fleming
Re: Why spam is a problem., Bob Braden
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Keith Moore
RE: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Christian Huitema
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Perry E. Metzger
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Dave Crocker
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Dave Crocker
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Russ Allbery
Re: Why spam is a problem., Melinda Shore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska
Re: Why spam is a problem., Ole J. Jacobsen
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Keith Moore
Fw: "I can still see it feasible to have all secretariat services funded by ICANN's budget.", Jim Fleming
Re: Why spam is a problem., Ted Gavin
Re: Why spam is a problem., Melinda Shore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
RE: Why spam is a problem., Louis Davidson
Re: Why spam is a problem., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Theodore Ts'o
Re: IETF announce list and spam filtering, Pekka Savola
Re: Urgh, ube/spam. time to change the subject line.., Randy Bush
IETF announce list and spam filtering, Theodore Ts'o
Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Re: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
RE: Why spam is a problem., Franck Martin
Re: Why spam is a problem., Anthony Atkielski
Re: Why spam is a problem., Anthony Atkielski
Re: Why spam is a problem., Anthony Atkielski
Re: Why spam is a problem., Måns Nilsson
Re: Why spam is a problem., Måns Nilsson
Urgh, ube/spam. time to change the subject line.., Christopher Evans
Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall
Re: Why spam is a problem., Marty Borden
Re: Why spam is a problem., John C Klensin
Re: Why spam is a problem., senthil ayyasamy
Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker
Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Re: Why spam is a problem., Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
RE: Why spam is a problem., Franck Martin
Re: Why spam is a problem., Jim Fleming
Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall
Re: Why Spam is a problem, Bill Cunningham
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Bill Sommerfeld
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker
Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska
RE: Why spam is a problem., Christian Huitema
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Why Spam is a problem, Bill Cunningham
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
RE: Why spam is a problem., william
Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska
Re: What on earth is the difference in broadcast and Multicast?, Fred Baker
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Donald Eastlake 3rd
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", Jeff Williams
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
What on earth is the difference in broadcast and Multicast?, Jian Bo Huang

Aug 13 2002

Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
ICANN now Paying for the GAC, Gordon Cook
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
RE: Why spam is a problem., Franck Martin
Re: Why spam is a problem., Bob Braden
Re: Why spam is a problem., Russ Allbery
Re: Why spam is a problem., John Stracke
Re: Why spam is a problem., Russ Allbery
Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall
Re: Why spam is a problem., Jeffrey I. Schiller
Re: Why spam is a problem., Markku Savela
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Måns Nilsson
Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall
Re: Why spam is a problem., Franck Martin
Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans
Re: Why spam is a problem., Pekka Savola
Re: Why spam is a problem., Marshall Rose
Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver
Re: Why spam is a problem., Tony Hansen
Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Re: Why spam is a problem., Markku Savela
Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Adam Shostack
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
Re: Why spam is a problem., David J. Aronson
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Karl Auerbach
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., william
Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall
Re: Why spam is a problem., Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Re: Why spam is a problem., Caitlin Bestler
Re: Why spam is a problem., Aaron Falk
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Billy Biggs
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Caitlin Bestler
Re: Why spam is a problem., Ted Gavin
Re: Why spam is a problem., william
Re: Why spam is a problem., Henning Schulzrinne
Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", John Stracke
Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why spam is a problem., Carsten Bormann
RE: Why spam is a problem., Christian Huitema
Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", Jim Fleming
Re: Why spam is a problem., Jim Fleming
Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", Stephen Sprunk
Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", todd glassey
Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", Jim Fleming
Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers", Jim Fleming
RFC2627, Beni Arazi

Aug 12 2002

Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1)), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: RFC Nos., Tony Hain
Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1)), Scott Brim
Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1)), Robert Cannon
Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1)), John Morris
Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root, Donald Eastlake 3rd
Re: RFC Nos., Michael StJohns
Re: RFC Nos., Christopher Evans
RFC Nos., Gaurang Pandya
Few Qs, Gaurang Pandya

Aug 11 2002

"...on so-called duplicate TLDs...", Jim Fleming
?:? .LARGE, Jim Fleming

Aug 10 2002

Re: [Admin] Warning (was: Re: [ga] 0:212 IPv8 Recommended .BIZ Registras), Jim Fleming
5:190 OCEAN.....Re: [ga] Nomination Procedure for nominating ICANN Board Director candidates, Jim Fleming
Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1)), Steven M. Bellovin
?:? .COOP, Jim Fleming

Aug 09 2002

0:212 BIZ, Jim Fleming
nomcom announcement - please volunteer, Phil Roberts
US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1)), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: PTR records and software support (was Re: Revisiting DNS Nota tion, Bill Manning
RE: PTR records and software support (was Re: Revisiting DNS Nota tion, Joe Baptista

Aug 08 2002

RE: PTR records and software support (was Re: Revisiting DNS Nota tion, Franck Martin
Re: PTR records and software support (was Re: Revisiting DNS Notation, Vernon Schryver
Re: Revisiting The DNS Notation Backwardsness Problem and Multiple Parallel Root Server Clusters, Stephen Sprunk
Re: Revisiting DNS Notation, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: PTR records and software support (was Re: Revisiting DNS Notation, Bill Manning
Re: Revisiting DNS Notation, John Stracke
Re: Revisiting DNS Notation, Mohsen BANAN
Re: PTR records and software support (was Re: Revisiting DNS Notation, John Stracke
PTR records and software support (was Re: Revisiting DNS Notation, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Revisiting The DNS Notation Backwardsness Problem andMultiple Parallel Root Server Clusters, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Revisiting The DNS Notation Backwardsness Problem and Multiple Parallel Root Server Clusters, Dave Crocker
Revisiting The DNS Notation Backwardsness Problem and Multiple Parallel Root Server Clusters, Mohsen BANAN
RE: [Feedback] Word Template, Jiwoong Lee
[no subject], Bill Cunningham

Aug 07 2002

Fwd: Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICANN! Not ORSC!, Einar Stefferud
Re: Raising and lowering the roof of the DNS;-)..., Einar Stefferud
"Technical solutions for social problems almost never work", Keith Moore
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Keith Moore
Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICANN! Not ORSC!, Jim Fleming
RE: Using MS Word template, Fred Baker
Re: Raising and lowering the roof of the DNS;-)..., Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Raising and lowering the roof of the DNS;-)..., Jim Fleming
RE: results of .... election, Joanna Lane
Re: 0:212 BIZ, Einar Stefferud
RE: results of .... election, Joanna Lane
Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICANN! Not ORSC!, Einar Stefferud
RE: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, TOMSON ERIC
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Raising and lowering the roof of the DNS;-)..., Einar Stefferud
"VeriSign is committed to expanding and serving the global Internet community.", Jim Fleming
Re: results of .... election, Jim Fleming
5:194 INC.....Re: 0:212 BIZ, Jim Fleming
Re: 0:212 BIZ, Jim Fleming
Re: 0:212 BIZ, Wonko_The_Sane
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Dave Crocker
Re: 0:212 BIZ, Jim Fleming
Re: 0:212 BIZ, Jim Fleming
RE: Using MS Word template, Craig Williams
Re: results of .... election, Jim Fleming
Re: 0:212 BIZ, Einar Stefferud
Re: Using MS Word template, Aaron Falk
results of .... election, Jim Fleming
Using MS Word template, Jiwoong Lee
Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC!, Caitlin Bestler
0:212 BIZ, Jim Fleming
Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC!, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Aug 06 2002

Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Dave Crocker
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC!, Dave Crocker
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC!, Fred Baker
Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC!, Stephen Sprunk
Re: Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC!, Dave Crocker
Revisiting - Re: Now: Next Generation Domains and DNS -- Was: Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC!, Mohsen BANAN
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re[2]: Unified RFC Protocol..., Timur Shemsedinov
2002 3:219 .INFO, Jim Fleming
Re: Unified RFC Protocol..., Timur Shemsedinov
Re: information on SMTP error code, Keith Moore
Re[2]: Unified RFC Protocol..., Timur Shemsedinov
RE: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: information on SMTP error code, Russ Allbery
information on SMTP error code, Franck Martin

Aug 05 2002

Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Keith Moore
RE: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Tony Hain
Re: Regulation of information services, Richard Shockey
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Keith Moore
Re: Regulation of information services, Michael Hammer
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Keith Moore
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Keith Moore
Regulation of information services, Michael Hammer
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Joe Baptista
Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Melinda Shore
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Einar Stefferud
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Einar Stefferud
Re: ECN and ISOC... tcptraceroutes needed, Sally Floyd
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Einar Stefferud
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
Re: Unified RFC Protocol..., John Stracke
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), John Stracke
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Tom Lord
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Tom Lord
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Tom Lord
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Tom Lord
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., John Stracke
Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker

Aug 04 2002

Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Melinda Shore
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Einar Stefferud
Re: network development History, Joe Touch
network development History, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Melinda Shore
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Perry E. Metzger
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Einar Stefferud
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Gordon Cook
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Melinda Shore

Aug 03 2002

Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Einar Stefferud
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Einar Stefferud
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Dave Crocker
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Gordon Cook
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Caitlin Bestler
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Donald Eastlake 3rd
Re: ECN and ISOC... tcptraceroutes needed, Franck Martin
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Gordon Cook

Aug 02 2002

Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Russ Allbery
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Joe Baptista
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Russ Allbery
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Dave Crocker
ECN and ISOC... tcptraceroutes needed, Franck Martin
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Keith Moore
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Matt Larson
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Keith Moore
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Dave Crocker
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Russ Allbery
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Joe Baptista
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Einar Stefferud
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Joe Baptista
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Bill Manning
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Keith Moore
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Joe Baptista
Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism..., Donald Eastlake 3rd
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), Joe Baptista
Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root), David Conrad

Mail converted by MHonArc