Response to complaint from Dean Anderson
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Response to complaint from Dean Anderson

After re-checking with legal counsel, I repeat what I said before, trying to be as clear as possible:

  Bouncing a message to the sender is NOT public defamation.

Therefore, your complaint about "defamation" has no merit.

Dean, I believe that:

- your complaint about the apparently incorrect ownership listing of AV8's address space is with ARIN
- your complaint about the listing of this address space with SORBS is with SORBS
- your complaint about ISC's use of SORBS is with ISC

None of these are issues that the IETF can solve for you. They are not matters that are relevant to the IETF list.

Take care.

                   Harald Alvestrand


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.