Re: Octal confusion with IP addresses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octal confusion with IP addresses

To: Merton Campbell Crockett <mcc at wlv.imsd.contel.com>
Subject: Re: Octal confusion with IP addresses
From: vcerf at NRI.Reston.VA.US
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 89 13:51:12 -0500
Cc: BMURPHY at bnr.ca, sturtevant at ccc.nmfecc.gov, ietf-interest at venera.isi.edu, vcerf at NRI.Reston.VA.US
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 20 Dec 89 20:32:14 -0800. <8912210432.AA13787@WLV.IMSD.CONTEL.COM>
Posted-date: Sun, 31 Dec 89 13:51:12 -0500

Merton,

I'm with you.

Bernie,

Which ever IP hosts choose to interpret leading 0 as an
octal indicator may have to be modified. Alternatively,
who puts out IP addresses with leading zeroes??

Vint Cerf

Prev by Date: Re: TCP/UDP Port numbers.
Next by Date: Re: TCP/UDP Port numbers.
Previous by thread: TCP/UDP Port numbers.
Next by thread: Status of RFCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.