Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards

To: stev at vax.ftp.com, steve at cise.nsf.gov
Subject: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
From: hedrick at cs.rutgers.edu
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 90 15:23:46 EST
Cc: gmalkin at monk.proteon.com, hedrick at aramis.rutgers.edu, ietf at venera.isi.edu, pgross at nri.reston.va.us
Posted-date: Tue, 13 Feb 90 15:23:46 EST

In fact I am somewhat sceptical about using a single routing protocol for
two different protocols.  This begins to tie together your support for
the two protocols.  It means that if something changes with one protocol,
your change is more likely to impact both.  It is not obvious to me that
there's much to be saved by putting ISO and IP routes in the same packet,
and the implications on system stability may be negative.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
Next by Date: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
Previous by thread: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
Next by thread: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.