Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards

To: stev at vax.ftp.com, steve at cise.nsf.gov
Subject: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
From: Stephen Wolff <steve at cise.nsf.gov>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 90 16:09:53 -0500
Cc: gmalkin at MONK.PROTEON.COM, hedrick at ARAMIS.RUTGERS.EDU, ietf at VENERA.ISI.EDU, louie at sayshell.umd.edu, medin at nsipo.nasa.gov, pgross at NRI.RESTON.VA.US
Posted-date: Tue, 13 Feb 90 16:09:53 -0500

We **have** some IS-IS experience.  We'll look at dual IS-IS, too.  Sure, we
could run separate protocols on the Backbone; but as neither choice forecloses
options for anybody else, what's the flap?  -s

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
  - From: jeff

Prev by Date: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
Next by Date: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
Previous by thread: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
Next by thread: Re: Intra-AS Routing Standards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.