![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Choosing a standard which allows vendors to choose from a list of standard IGPs will only perpetuate situations like the above. Routers still won't interoperate unless their vendors have made compatible choices. That doesn't sound much different from not having a standard. WE NEED AT LEAST ONE GOOD MANDATORY IGP! WE NEEDED IT LONG AGO! THE IAB SHOULD SERIOUSLY CONSIDER CHOOSING ONE NEXT WEEK! I second Phil's comment, yet again. Please note that 'at least' is a good word choice. No serious problem with a list, (although it will make vendors lives more difficult) but gotta have it be mandatory. john
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.