![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> (1) Each of us would receive a number of tokens/credits each month; > (2) Mail would remove tokens and would be possible only while > positive credits are available; so far this has the "token ring" fairness attributes - works fine and is conventional democracy. > (3) Tokens could be increased/decreased via positive/negative votes > that the list would send (when aroused) to the list server. this mechanism (games theory (see Hofstadter - iterated prisoners dilemma)) will lead to ever increasing blandness on the list in one of 2 ways (extremes on a spctrum): i) either a czar sends nacks - they deterimine a single point of view takes over (see monitor station on cambridge ring) ii) all objections/nacks from all sources quench senders - reduces content to lowest common denomitor - in evolutionary terms, regression to mean & population stagnation...
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.