![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
<<On Tue, 06 Jan 1998 10:17:44 -0500, "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie at UU.NET> said: > Of course, you've now made the conversion between this time scale and > a particular instance of wall-clock time much more complicated than adding > a fixed offset. Grief is conserved. Except, of course, that Arthur Olson has already solved that problem for us (and, for recent-historical times, this was already the case). There was some flamage on comp.protocols.time.ntp not too long ago saying that NTP should have been designed to tick TAI, and leave it up to the end users to figure out whether they want to observe TAI, TAI plus a fixed offset, or UTC. (Of course, the POSIX botch strikes again.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman at lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.