Re: [URN] Re: URI documents
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [URN] Re: URI documents
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter at parc.xerox.com>
- Subject: Re: [URN] Re: URI documents
- From: Patrik Fältström <paf at swip.net>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 10:22:31 +0100
- Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand at maxware.no>, Dan Connolly <connolly at w3.org>, Leslie Daigle <leslie at Bunyip.Com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding at kiwi.ics.uci.edu>, jcurran at bbn.com, harald.t.alvestrand at uninett.no, moore at cs.utk.edu, uri at Bunyip.Com, urn-ietf at Bunyip.Com
- Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 08:31:39 -0500
- In-reply-to: <34B336E2.56E4F403@parc.xerox.com>
- References: <34AD07E4.5B7E@w3.org> <Pine.SUN.3.95.971224144845.28624G-100000@beethoven.bunyip.com> <199712262257.XAA19060@dokka.kvatro.no> <3.0.3.32.19980107072758.030d8960@nix.swip.net>
- Sender: owner-uri at Bunyip.Com
At 00:03 1998-01-07 PST, Larry Masinter wrote:
>If we attempted to remove any indication that the URI document did
>anything more than specify the syntax of URIs and how that syntax
>should be processed by URI-processing software, with any semantic
>interpretation of the *meaning*, do you think we could get beyond
>the current impasse?
Yes.
See my posting on this problem with the different levels of characters,
octets etc, that should float around on this list, as one example of what
complicates things -- which shows that we should make this simpler, not
more complicated.
Patrik
Email: paf at swip.net URL: http://www.tele2.se
PGP: 4D38 91A4 27D9 C8B2 6975 D6BB 21D0 4C57 BD23 6602
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
