Re: [URN] Re: URI documents
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [URN] Re: URI documents
- To: masinter at parc.xerox.com
- Subject: Re: [URN] Re: URI documents
- From: Michael Mealling <michael at bailey.dscga.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 11:15:45 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: paf at swip.net, Harald.Alvestrand at maxware.no, connolly at w3.org, leslie at Bunyip.Com, fielding at kiwi.ics.uci.edu, jcurran at bbn.com, harald.t.alvestrand at uninett.no, moore at cs.utk.edu, uri at Bunyip.Com, urn-ietf at Bunyip.Com
- Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 11:45:20 -0500
- In-reply-to: <34B336E2.56E4F403@parc.xerox.com> from Larry Masinter at "Jan 7, 98 00:03:46 am"
- Reply-to: michaelm at rwhois.net
- Sender: owner-uri at Bunyip.Com
Larry Masinter said this:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
>
> If we attempted to remove any indication that the URI document did
> anything more than specify the syntax of URIs and how that syntax
> should be processed by URI-processing software, with any semantic
> interpretation of the *meaning*, do you think we could get beyond
> the current impasse?
>
It would go along way to making me happy. I still prefer two (c)
documents, though.
-MM
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Mealling | 505 Huntmar Park Drive | Phone: (703)742-0400
Software Engineer | Herndon, VA 22070 | Fax: (703)742-9552
Network Solutions | <URL:http://www.netsol.com> | michaelm at rwhois.net
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
