![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Tuesday, February 03, 1998 2:48 PM, Kent Crispin[SMTP:kent at songbird.com] wrote: @On Tue, Feb 03, 1998 at 02:08:04PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: @> On Tue, Feb 03, 1998 at 08:32:16AM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: @> > @> > Given the force of the White House and the generally positive press the @> > Green Paper is getting, there needs to be a concerted campaign to educate @> > the public about the detriments caused by allowing registries to be run as @> > for-profits. @ @> You mean the "detriments" of better service and lower prices, right? @ @I think he is referring to the detriments such as NSI charging $50 @for something that, according to all accounts I've seen, costs them $5 @or less. [That figure alone should remove all doubt that a TLD @registry is in fact a pure monopoly.] @ @I think if you want a clear example of better service and lower @prices you should look to Nominet. @ Kent, Who is going to pay for all of the costs that you have personally helped to add to the Registry Industry ? Are you still an employee of the U.S. Government ? Will the U.S. Government be paying for all of the costs that the CORE registrars have incurred ? Will the ISOC ? Will USC/ISI ? Is it true that CORE is now requesting $2,000 per month from each of the 80+ registrars ? Jim Fleming Unir Corporation IBC, Tortola, BVI
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.