![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Tuesday, February 03, 1998 8:42 PM, Dave Crocker[SMTP:dcrocker at brandenburg.com] wrote: <snip> @ @In any event, the IODesign approach is in the for-profit category and so I, @for one, still do not support it. @ For-profit and non-profit are not always that much different in the Information Age where services are the dominant activity and white collar workers are paid large sums to push bits around as opposed to brooms on factory floors. A non-profit company can be set up and can demand large sums of money from people without their agreement. Then that company can pay large salaries and give their employees travel perks and other benefits in an effort to spend all of the money. Whether the company is for-profit (with no profit) or non-profit is not noticable. Non-profit does not mean low-cost. Non-profit does not mean responsive to society. Non-profit in this day and age just means that the company took some special steps to get IRS approval and that the company wants to create an impression they are serving the public good. In many cases, this is only an impression. I suggest that you compare and contrast NSI and ARIN to try to illustrate the vast differences that you seem to see in for-profit and non-profit. When you do that you might find that for-profit companies have to be much more responsive to customers because there is competition. Non-profits can often operate without being concerned about outside input because they have a monopoly. People seem to equate monopoly with for-profit. As with ARIN and NSI, this is not the case. ARIN has convinced people it needs be a monopoly where NSI is creating a distribution channel via other registries. ARIN is designed to keep all of the benefits for itself, whereas NSI is spreading things out. The recent split of NSI into WorldNIC and InterNIC is just one example. You do not see ARIN encouraging more similar companies. In my opinion, the past is clear. There is one group that wants to hoard resources for its own pleasure and profits (be they non or otherwise) and there are other companies that want to help grow the Registry Industry. It is not hard to tell which are which and the labels for-profit and non-profit are not the clue. One has to look to the people involved to gain true insight into what the motives are for the company. Simple labels do not tell the story. Jim Fleming Unir Corporation IBC, Tortola, BVI
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.