![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Just as a point of reference, I regularly use ssh (which has quite a | bit of overhead) for interactive traffic over a modem, and I can't | detect any difference in latency over a non-protected connection. I | think the days where we need to worry about the extra overhead are | also over. Another important consideration (the first being the CPU issues) is behavior in the face of suboptimalities in network performance (i.e. loss or excessive jitter). Yesterday I was fighting a nasty battle against both and found ssh to be unusuable for interactive work, even though telnet worked acceptably. I'm not sure if the CPU commentary is meaningful in a CBC vs. OFB/CFB discussion, versus an "encrypt vs. not encrypt" discussion. --jhawk
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.