![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
HELLO BOB - Mr Crispin's comment on IETF views concerning the US Government [quoted below], is based on an inaccurate characterization of USG policy, as well as pure speculation regarding the views of the "majority of the IETF". Even the most casual reading of the several official USG pronouncements on Internet governance, should make it clear that the USG has no intention of "running the Internet's affairs". Further - your characterization of the I* bodies as "(Americans)" is quite incorrect. There is, in fact, a substantial non American (i.e. non-US American) presence in these bodies. Take a look at the ISOC Board of Trustees, and other I* leadership bodies. Take a look at the IETF registrants, sources of IETF postings, etc. That said though - the more significant point, I believe, is that in my experience, these folks who you choose to brand as 'renegade dictators' are generally respected - world-wide - as major contributors to the creation of the Internet phenomenon, and are seriously concerned about its healthy further evolution. C.Joe P--> [USA Citizen *and* Netizen] ========================================== Kent Crispin wrote: >I suspect the majority of the IETF doesn't feel that it needs Ira >Magaziner, or any other USG bureaucrat to run its affairs, either. Bob Allisat replied: "Interesting. IETF, IANA, IAB, ISOC, IESG, ETC, organizations made up of more or less the same people (Americans) believe them selves to be above any law. Even that of the US which funded and created their Internet playground. Very amusing. Now if these people feel their own US Government has no jurisdiction over their ACRONYM activities who does? It certainly isn't the so- called "Netizens" who are *never* given any opportunity to vote on anything. Is it the UN? If The Secretary General of The United Nations issued a Paper calling for elections, open public process, accountability, wide participation, etc. what would happen? I suspect exactly the same thing. He/she would be told "Stay out of our business". So IETF/IANA/ISOC/IAHC/ITAG/ETC regard themselves as a sort of overarchingand imperious cyber world government. They will take direction from *no-one* and regard themselves as above any law not of their own making. A pretty chilling reality. It is imperative that some group working in the public trust finally controls this collection of totalitarian leaning technocrats before they turn the whole Internet into some sort of Virtual Gulag with themselves permanently installed as info-czar leadership forever. And the 60 plus million rest of us as are relegated permanent to info-serf inmate status. TeleVirtually Yours, Bob Allisat http://www.wtv.net http://www.fcn.net" ========================================
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.