RE: Orlando meeting?

To: <ietf at ns.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Orlando meeting?
From: Pete Resnick <presnick at qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 17:57:22 -0600
Cc: Uri Blumenthal <uri at watson.ibm.com>, Rik Drummond <drummond at ONRAMP.NET>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker at brandenburg.com>, "Andrew M. Benhase" <abenhase at gte.net>
Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 19:03:19 -0500
In-reply-to: <199802162343.RAA02022@smtp1.mailsrvcs.net>
References: <9802161948.AA74652@v9n42en0.watson.ibm.com>

On 2/16/98 at 5:44 PM -0600, Andrew M. Benhase wrote:

>There seems to be growing support for the idea of having the meeting in
>Orlando? ;-0

There seems to be growing support for the idea of Orlando having a
reasonable airport. Is there anyone else out there who has an opinion (pro
or con) on the advisability of having the meeting at an attractive tourist
site? (That was my original question.)

pr
--
Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick at qualcomm.com>
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Work: (217)337-6377 or (619)651-4478 / Fax: (217)337-1980

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Orlando meeting?
  - From: Howard Weiss

References:
- Re: Orlando meeting?
  - From: Uri Blumenthal
- RE: Orlando meeting?
  - From: Andrew M. Benhase

Prev by Date: RE: Orlando meeting?
Next by Date: Orlando
Previous by thread: RE: Orlando meeting?
Next by thread: Re: Orlando meeting?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: Orlando meeting?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.