![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Another place that .COM Clusters can be useful is when "censorship" is desired. One can imagine deploying a .COM Cluster that only had the Fortune 10,000 COMpany names in the data base. Large companies could then point their name servers to this cluster and their CEOs could sleep better at night knowing that they are only providing name resolution services for the 10,000 companies "approved" by the service provider of the Fortune 10,000 .COM Cluster. The 10,000 owners of the <SLD>.COM names would of course be asked for a registration fee to be listed among this elite group. ATT.COM would likely be one of the obvious candidates to be entered and could also be a user of this .COM Cluster. This would help prevent Affirmative Action and EEO issues from arising, because the company would be pro-actively preventing employees from doing or seeing things that are not part of the work place. The technology is evolving to be able to provide this type of "service". With millions of names in .COM, it is likely that sub-set services may have some merit. If companies are willing to pay for these services, then other companies will likely call upon their technical people to make it happen. It is important that IETF members understand what is possible. Then they can advise their companies properly. - Jim Fleming Unir Corporation IBC, Tortola, BVI
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.