Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs

To: Jim Fleming <JimFleming at doorstep.unety.net>
Subject: Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
From: Jeff.Hodges at stanford.edu
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:53:49 -0800
Cc: "ietf at ns.ietf.org" <ietf at ns.ietf.org>
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 20:12:12 -0500
In-reply-to: Fleming's message of Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:39:00 -0600
Reply-to: ietf at ns.ietf.org
Sender: hodges at Wind.Stanford.EDU

JimFleming at doorstep.unety.net said:
> I suggest that you play with some RSCs and .COM clusters and watch the
> messages being exchanged and you will see this is not the case.

Can/will you cite specific addresses/names of RSCs and .COM clusters for folks 
to poke at?

thanks,

Jeff

Prev by Date: Re: The Fortune 10,000 .COM Cluster
Next by Date: RE: The Fortune 10,000 .COM Cluster
Previous by thread: RE: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
Next by thread: RE: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.