Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs

To: Steve Bellovin <smb at research.att.com>
Subject: Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
From: Simon Spero <ses at tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 21:03:27 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "ietf at ns.ietf.org" <ietf at ns.ietf.org>
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 21:13:10 -0500
In-reply-to: <199803192210.RAA26013@postal.research.att.com>

On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Steve Bellovin wrote:
> 
> No, thanks; been there, done that, didn't like it.  I'm referring,
> of course, to those uucp days of yore, when sending mail was an

Oooh- who manages .uucp now?  :-)

Simon

References:
- Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
  - From: Steve Bellovin

Prev by Date: RFC 2010
Next by Date: AT&T is the Key to the InterNIC Info
Previous by thread: Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
Next by thread: RE: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.