Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs

To: ietf at ns.ietf.org, smb at research.att.com
Subject: Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
From: Gunnar Lindberg <lindberg at CDG.CHALMERS.SE>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 08:57:57 +0100 (MET)
Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 03:10:35 -0500

>Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:10:57 -0500
>From: Steve Bellovin <smb at research.att.com>
>Message-Id: <199803192210.RAA26013 at postal.research.att.com>

   ...

>In my opinion, "root server clusters" -- and dressed up in any name
>at all -- would be the single worst thing that could happen to the
>Net.  It would completely destroy the global namespace of the
>Internet.

Yup.

    Sir, what's your mail address, please?

    <lindberg at cdg.chalmers.se>

    Thank you, Sir. Er, hm, on which Internet, Sir?

Great future ahead...

        Gunnar Lindberg

Prev by Date: Re: The Green Paper is One Small Component
Next by Date: Re: The Green Paper is One Small Component
Previous by thread: RE: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
Next by thread: Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.