![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Fri, Mar 20, 1998 at 12:42:31AM -0500, Keith Moore wrote: > > All this is to say that, yes, there are risks of ambiguity, but not > > due to RSC. The risk comes when there are disputed TLDs. > > Another risk is that people will start a 'land grab' on TLDs similar > to what's happened with subdomains of .COM. Any rules for allocating > new TLDs that are based solely on competition, whether they be > "first-come-first-served" or "my lawyers are bigger than your lawyers" > or even "we have nukes, you don't" robs the net community of any hope > of reasonable organization of TLD space. Easily dealt with. You can have "N" TLDs (where "N" is some small number, say, three or four) until you demonstrate through a public audit process that you have at least "X" registrants per TLD in use on average. The cost of that audit (ie: calling up Arthur Andersen) is borne by the registry. Is this onerous? No. Let's assume that you have to be able to document 20,000 SLD registrations in a TLD to get another TLD assigned to you, and you started with three. Let's further assume that the audit costs you $20,000 to have done. That's $0.30/SLD for the audit. Is this a significant cost center? You tell me. > Another risk is that the number of TLDs will grow so large that TLD > queries are no longer likely to be in cache. This has implications > for response time and reliability of DNS, as well as bandwidth usage. > > Keith That's a bald-faced lie. COM/NET/ORG are on the roots right now. Forcing NSI to remove them to their own machines, and replacing them with 15,000 TLDs (1% of the current load they carry) is the best possible single performance improvement we could make in the DNS system. Right now ALL COM/NET/ORG queries have to hit the roots to get the NS lines for the next level down. You would increase *ROOT SERVER* cache coherency by 99%, decrease system load by 99%, decrease RAM and processor requirements by similar amounts, and massively IMPROVE service to the end user. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%! Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.