![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Fri, Mar 20, 1998 at 02:41:44PM +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > My mind is made up, so don't confuse me with facts... > > Owners of current root servers: > > Servers Name Federal money > > A Internic Hah! > B ISI Yes > C PSI No > D University of Maryland Yes > E NASA Yes > F Internet Software Cons. No (Paul Vixie) > G, H US Defense Yes > I Nordunet No > J NSI No > K Ripe NCC No > L ISI Yes > M WIDE No > > 6 I'm almost certain have US government funding, 1 would pay almost anything > to keep them (IMHO), but currently Government related, > 3 definite no's (the non-US ones), 3 I-don't-knows. > > I believe this argument is fundamentally irrelevant; for any of these > organizations, keeping a root name server running is pocket change > compared to the rest of the money they spend on Internet matters. > > But I've heard this argument too often. > > Harald A I corrected your table :-) However, the last three (K/L/M) are pretty new, and many people's hints files don't contain them. The point here isn't that these could be moved (they could). The point is effective market power. Most of the nameservers out there never are reconfigured off default hints. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%! Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.