RE: The IPv4 or IPv6 Internet ?

To: "ietf at ns.ietf.org" <ietf at ns.ietf.org>, "'Gunnar Lindberg'" <lindberg at CDG.CHALMERS.SE>, "'Peter Deutsch'" <peterd at Bunyip.Com>, "smb at research.att.com" <smb at research.att.com>
Subject: RE: The IPv4 or IPv6 Internet ?
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming at doorstep.unety.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 10:07:19 -0600
Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 11:22:41 -0500
Encoding: 28 TEXT

On Friday, March 20, 1998 9:19 AM, Peter Deutsch[SMTP:peterd at Bunyip.Com] wrote:
<snip>
@
@Sadly, it *is* appropriate for today's ietf list. I only
@wish I could really understand why we could build a
@network of millions of hosts in such a short time and
@without any central planning, yet can't get this
@particular problem to the point I can really understand it.
@

If it helps any, I think that the top 10 issues are:

1. Fat Clients vs. Thin Clients.
2. End-to-end Service Models vs. Proxy/Agent Service Models
3. Chaos vs. Quality of Service
4. Computers vs. Telephones
5. Mult-Hop Routing vs. ATM
6. IPv6 vs. IPv8
7. Unstructured vs. Structured Root
8. Academics vs. ISPs
9. Clueless vs. Clueful
10. NSF vs. Venture Capitalists

...some of these the IETF can address...
-
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation
IBC, Tortola, BVI

Prev by Date: RE: RFC 2010
Next by Date: Re: .COM Clusters are Not RSCs
Previous by thread: Re: The IPv4 or IPv6 Internet ?
Next by thread: I-D ACTION:draft-vaananen-mpls-tm-framework-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: The IPv4 or IPv6 Internet ?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.