Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard

To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb at clark.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry at piermont.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 09:02:15 -0500
Cc: ietf at ns.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 09:15:57 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 31 Mar 1998 02:30:45 EST." <v03007802b146019564cb@[142.154.136.3]>
Reply-to: perry at piermont.com

"Howard C. Berkowitz" writes:
> I may have missed a writeup that already exists,

Such as the documents we are discussing, yes....

> but the two quotes below add to my feeling there needs to be a clear
> architectural discussion of:

The issues you raise are discussed in the documents. Please read them.

Perry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
  - From: Howard C. Berkowitz

References:
- Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
  - From: Howard C. Berkowitz

Prev by Date: R: about filedudes
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.