Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard

["Perry E. Metzger" <perry at piermont.com>]

"Howard C. Berkowitz" writes:
> I can get along with stating thing in those terms, although I would suggest
> that this conscious limiting doesn't come across in the architecture
> document.  Again, my concern is that the enterprise network architect
> realistically is not going to go back to the charter.

He isn't going to read an RFC, either. They are too technical given
the quality of personel likely to be available these days. If he did
read and understand the given RFCs, however, he'd know the information
that he needs, in all likelyhood.

Perry