Re: Structuring the Root

To: rmeyer at mhsc.com (Roeland M.J. Meyer)
Subject: Re: Structuring the Root
From: Owain Vaughan <owain at AXA.CO.UK>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:08:27 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: JimFleming at doorstep.unety.net, arin-council at arin.net, BBURR at ntia.doc.gov, Harald.Alvestrand at maxware.no, ietf at ietf.org, naipr at arin.net, domain-policy at open-rsc.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 06:30:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <199804230956.CAA03332@condor.mhsc.com> from "Roeland M.J. Meyer" at Apr 23, 98 02:56:12 am

> >The pigeon-hole I wanted to stick you into was the state of incorporation
> >of the company (or companies).
> 
> One company, different divisions.

Use subdomains. 

> >Sounds fair enough?
> 
> Nope. because that would be DE.US and *that's* a dead domain,
> marketing-wise.

Who said anything about marketing. That's the whole point in my plan, that
DNS names wouldn't have any marketing value..

> Besides we have NO/ZERO/ZILCH/NADA offices there. Therefore
> we can't go down to the city level, unless you mean for us to use the city
> of our registered agent. Also, most of the US corporate world is
> incorporated there. The other popular jurisdiction is Nevada.

Indeed this is true.

> If you want to see a MASSIVE trademark fight then go ahead. 
 
Why would that be then?

Owain

References:
- Re: Structuring the Root
  - From: Roeland M.J. Meyer

Prev by Date: Re: Structuring the Root
Next by Date: RE: VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP
Previous by thread: Re: Structuring the Root
Next by thread: RE: Structuring the Root
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Structuring the Root

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.