![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
CAT/GSSV2 fanciers: I've just sent a revised 2078bis I-D to the secretariat, to become draft-ietf-cat-rfc2078bis-04.txt and capturing the agreed final changes in the high-level document for GSS-V2, Update 1. Unless issues are raised to the list regarding draft-ietf-cat-gssv2-cbind-05 within the WG Last-Call period thereon extending through Friday, 1 May, I'll assume that the pair of high-level and bindings documents are ready for submission to the IESG on behalf of the WG thereafter, requesting consideration for advancement to Proposed Standards. --jl > ---------- > From: Linn, John[SMTP:jlinn at securitydynamics.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 1998 10:20 AM > To: 'CAT-WG List' > Subject: CAT WG Last-Call: draft-ietf-cat-gssv2-cbind-05 > > CAT/GSSV2 fanciers: > > Given that we've now agreed the small number of changes to RFC2078bis > which > will render it sufficient to represent WG consensus for submission to the > IESG, I believe that it would be useful if possible to be able to submit > the > C bindings as well as a combined package, targeting recommendation for a > related pair of Proposed Standards. To this end, I'd like to open a WG > Last-Call on draft-ietf-cat-gssv2-cbind-05, to extend through Friday, 1 > May. > Since the C bindings have evolved and become relatively stable over some > time, and a significant proportion of the changes made to 2078bis were > made > for the purpose of alignment with the bindings document, it's my hope that > this can be a smooth and straightforward process. > > Comments or discussion? > > --jl > > > John Linn (linn at rsa.com) > RSA Laboratories East, Bedford, MA, USA >
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.