![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The IESG has approved publication of the following Internet-Drafts as Proposed Standards: o Voice Profile for Internet Mail - version 2 <draft-ema-vpim-08.txt> o Toll Quality Voice - 32 kbit/s ADPCM MIME Sub-type Registration <draft-ema-vpim-32kadpcm-03.txt> o VPIM Voice Message MIME Sub-type Registration <draft-ema-vpim-vmsg-03.txt> o Content Duration MIME Header Definition <draft-ema-vpim-dur-03.txt> These documents have been reviewed in the IETF but are not the product of an IETF Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Harald Alvestrand and Keith Moore. Technical Summary The VPIM specification outlines a way of carrying voice mail traffic using SMTP and MIME. It's primarily intended as a medium of interchange between dissimilar voice mail systems, but ordinary MIME user agents can also receive such messages if they support the audio/32kadpcm content-type. Such user agents could also send vpim-compatible voice messages with slight modifications to generate the multipart/voice-message content-type. The audio/32kadpcm specification updates the definition of the MIME content-type for A-law or mu-law 32kbps audio data encoded according to ITU-T recommendation G.726. The multipart/voice-message specification defines a MIME encapsulation for a voice message (possibly consisting of multiple audio parts) along with associated directory information in vcard format. It allows, for instance, a spoken name and spoken subject, each in its own MIME body part, to accompany the "body" of a voice message. Working Group Summary This is not the product of an IETF working group, but is the product of the VPIM working group of the Electronic Messaging Association. It has nevertheless had extensive review by the IETF community to ensure that it is reasonably compatible with MIME. Protocol Quality Keith Moore reviewed the spec for IESG. There are numerous implementations by voice mail product vendors.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.