Re: PAB Re: Consensus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PAB Re: Consensus

To: Jay Fenello <Jay at Iperdome.com>
Subject: Re: PAB Re: Consensus
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 98 03:41 PDT
Cc: pab at gtld-mou.org, comments at iana.org, ietf at ietf.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 07:15:05 -0400
References: <19980703175955.20901@songbird.com> <Pine.LNX.3.95.980704051103.21241B-100000@caitanya.silverse rver.co.at> <3.0.2.32.19980704021016.02f33050@mindspring.com>

All meetings are equal, the 'IFWP' meeting in Reston, the EU meeting in
Brussels, the ISOC meeting in Geneva, the APIA meeting in Singapore, and
any other meeting.  The hubris or machination that one meeting or group
subsumes or represents another is, at best, uninteresting.

What is interesting is the *constructive* *input* from these meetings or
from individuals.

randy

References:
- Re: PAB Re: Consensus
  - From: Jay Fenello

Prev by Date: Re: PAB Re: Consensus on "iana incorporation" competence/authority of "ifwp"?
Next by Date: IETF newbies/turnover
Previous by thread: Re: PAB Re: Consensus on "iana incorporation" competence/authority of "ifwp"?
Next by thread: IP QoS issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.