![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Masataka, I agree with Karl that IP QoS is still quite a long way off. It's not as easy as reusing ATM techniques. Instability of routes is bound to maintain QoS difficult and it's not a solved problem. Thanks Reni Ninan -----Original Message----- From: Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp] Sent: Sunday, July 05, 1998 5:53 PM To: karl at CaveBear.com Cc: wiztech at CMPNETMAIL.COM; ietf at ietf.org Subject: Re: IP QoS issues Karl; > Of course, we still have a very long way to go before we achieve QoS > across broad areas of the Internet. Not so much. Techniques developped for ATM can be reused. > Aggregation techniques, such as > diff-serve, are needed to keep router state within reasonable bounds. And > we need to get policy controls in place so that we can prevent everyone > from simply asking for, and receiving, preferential QoS values. Those are the misunderstandings which is acting as the major obstacles on the short way. > And instability of routes is going to make it difficult to maintain QoS > once a path is established. A solved problem. Masataka Ohta
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.