![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> > > Furthermore the paths of vcs from different routers can overlap > > > in > > > the backbone and this cannot be noticed explicitly. The aggregate > > > numbers > > > work out because each router can only put so much traffic into > > > the net, > > > Then problems can come up if many routers use the same internal > > > path. > > > > That some ATM switches can not support so many VCs/VPs is a problem > > of the ATM swichies. > > > Depends always on the size of the ATM switch. Most switches that are used on > the backbone (eg. Newbridge 36190 Core Services Switch) goes up to a maximum > 2.000.000 VPCs and VCCs per switch. Generally, high-capacity ATM switches > have adequate capacity. Don't you think that IP routers can do the same thing? Masataka Ohta
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.