Re: IP QoS issues

To: Constantine Protopapas <wiztech at cmpnetmail.com>
Subject: Re: IP QoS issues
From: peter dawson <peterdd at GTO.NET.OM>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 21:53:48 +0400
Cc: Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, ietf at ietf.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 14:10:32 -0400
References: <002601bdaa97$f62bef60$39c21ec2@wiztech.hol.gr>

Constantine :

Constantine Protopapas wrote:

> > > Depends always on the size of the ATM switch. Most switches
>
> > that are used on
> > > the backbone (eg. Newbridge 36190 Core Services Switch)
> goes up
> > to a maximum
> > > 2.000.000 VPCs and VCCs per switch. Generally,
> high-capacity
> > ATM switches
> > > have adequate capacity.
> >
> > Don't you think that IP routers can do the same thing?
>
> Theoretically yes.

What mechanism are present at the IP level which guarantees a VC
/VP ??

/pete

Follow-Ups:
- RE: IP QoS issues
  - From: Constantine Protopapas
- Re: IP QoS issues
  - From: Masataka Ohta

References:
- RE: IP QoS issues
  - From: Constantine Protopapas

Prev by Date: RE: IP QoS issues
Next by Date: FW: IP QoS issues
Previous by thread: RE: IP QoS issues
Next by thread: Re: IP QoS issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IP QoS issues

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.