Re: IP QoS issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IP QoS issues

To: peterdd at GTO.NET.OM (peter dawson)
Subject: Re: IP QoS issues
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 98 6:31:59 JST
Cc: wiztech at cmpnetmail.com, mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp, ietf at ietf.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 18:01:20 -0400
In-reply-to: <35A3B22C.93825FDA@gto.net.om>; from "peter dawson" at Jul 8, 98 9:53 pm

Pete;

> > > Don't you think that IP routers can do the same thing?
> >
> > Theoretically yes.
> 
> What mechanism are present at the IP level which guarantees a VC
> /VP ??

Do you mean TCP/UDP port # for VPI/VCI?

Or RSVP for Q.2931?

Both are available already, of course.

							Masataka Ohta

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IP QoS issues
  - From: peter dawson

References:
- Re: IP QoS issues
  - From: peter dawson

Prev by Date: Document Action: Naming Plan for Internet Directory-Enabled Applications to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Document Action: XML Media Types to Informational
Previous by thread: Re: IP QoS issues
Next by thread: Re: IP QoS issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.