RE: IP QoS issues

To: "peter dawson" <peterdd at GTO.NET.OM>
Subject: RE: IP QoS issues
From: "Constantine Protopapas" <wiztech at cmpnetmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 20:45:27 +0300
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 14:22:20 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <35A3B22C.93825FDA@gto.net.om>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter dawson [mailto:peterdd at gto.net.om]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 July 1998 19:54
> To: Constantine Protopapas
> Cc: Masataka Ohta; ietf at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IP QoS issues
>
>
> Constantine :

> What mechanism are present at the IP level which guarantees a VC
> /VP ??

None. That's what IETF tries to do with MPLS on IP. I still think though
that the best approach is IP+ATM.

References:
- Re: IP QoS issues
  - From: peter dawson

Prev by Date: Re: .GOV ??
Next by Date: RE: IP QoS issues
Previous by thread: Re: IP QoS issues
Next by thread: Re: IP QoS issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: IP QoS issues

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.