FW: IP QoS issues

To: <peterdd at GTO.NET.OM>
Subject: FW: IP QoS issues
From: "Constantine Protopapas" <wiztech at hol.gr>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 08:18:16 +0300
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 01:23:46 -0400
Importance: Normal
Reply-to: <wiztech at hol.gr>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Constantine Protopapas [mailto:wiztech at cmpnetmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, 9 July 1998 19:45
> To: peter dawson
> Cc: ietf at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: IP QoS issues
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: peter dawson [mailto:peterdd at gto.net.om]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 July 1998 19:54
> > To: Constantine Protopapas
> > Cc: Masataka Ohta; ietf at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: IP QoS issues
> >
> >
> > Constantine :
> 
> > What mechanism are present at the IP level which guarantees a VC
> > /VP ??
> 
> None. That's what IETF tries to do with MPLS on IP. I still think though
> that the best approach is IP+ATM.
> 
>

Prev by Date: End to End QoS across the Internet
Next by Date: FW: IP QoS issues
Previous by thread: RE: IP QoS issues
Next by thread: FW: IP QoS issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

FW: IP QoS issues

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.