Re: IP QoS issues

To: Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: IP QoS issues
From: peter dawson <peterdd at GTO.NET.OM>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 11:11:20 +0400
Cc: wiztech at cmpnetmail.com, ietf at ietf.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 03:23:20 -0400
References: <199807082132.GAA11227@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Masataka

Masataka Ohta wrote:

> Pete;
>
> > > > Don't you think that IP routers can do the same thing?
> > >
> > > Theoretically yes.
> >
> > What mechanism are present at the IP level which guarantees a
> VC
> > /VP ??
>
> Do you mean TCP/UDP port # for VPI/VCI?
>

Nope, I meant at the IP layer there are no current specifications
which can guarantee a VC or VP.

> Or RSVP for Q.2931?
>
> Both are available already, of course.
>
>

Could you throw me some pointers to this ..in context of any
IPv6/Flow label ??would appreciate it :)

thaaks


/pete

References:
- Re: IP QoS issues
  - From: Masataka Ohta

Prev by Date: FW: IP QoS issues
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 QoS Implmentation
Previous by thread: Re: IP QoS issues
Next by thread: RE: IP QoS issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IP QoS issues

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.