![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Austin ; Austin Poulton wrote: > Hi - > i have read through the ipv6 standards and drafts (as they are > currently) > and although there is space allocated in the ip6 header for > traffic class > and flow id, no clear indication is given of QoS functionality > within the > protocol. > Does anyone know of an ip6 implementation with intrinsic QoS > support - > a CAC, flow policing fucntions, signalling etc. > To the best of my knowledgen there is no further difination onhow Flow labels would be actaully implementated and is still unclear. > Is there a QoS model particular to ip6 (not rsvp) that the > ietf is > considering? > I think it would be MPLS on IP ( I don't know much about this ) or FAst IP based on NHRP , however Connecvitiy remians goverened by the Router based policies. This I tend to belive (IMO) is more of a performace optimising technique rather then QoS. > It seems to me that the only solution currently is rsvp with > ip6 - is there > any hope of QoS being built into the layer 3 protocol? > Vendor specific implemtation is considered.with the range of SSR (SmartSwitchRouter ) products. /pete
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.