Re: Last Call: Originator-Info Message Header to Experimental

To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst at W3.ORG>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Originator-Info Message Header to Experimental
From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <Shmuel at ACM.ORG>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 07:28:25 -0400
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 09:09:59 -0400
In-reply-to: <199807150844.RAA16902@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
Organization: Atid/2

In <199807150844.RAA16902 at sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>, on 07/15/1998
   at 04:19 PM, "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst at w3.org> said:

>I agree with Shmuel that UTF-8 is the way to go. But doing this
>header-by-header might not really be the best solution.

Yes. The only reason that I brought it up was that the draft had
language encouraging alternate encodings.

-----------------------------------------------------------
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2
     Team OS/2
     Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------

The US Senate thinks you need your junk email.  Now the House of Reps.
is considering  the issue.   Let them know how
you feel about junk email! Info available at
http://www.ybecker.net/pink/ page of the Forum for Responsible and 
Ethical Email.

References:
- Re: Last Call: Originator-Info Message Header to Experimental
  - From: Martin J. Duerst

Prev by Date: Re: (재전송) RE: End to End QoS across the Internet
Next by Date: WG REVIEW: Protocol Independent Multicast (pim)
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: Originator-Info Message Header to Experimental
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Originator-Info Message Header to Experimental
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: Originator-Info Message Header to Experimental

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.