Re: Tired of Waiting

To: <perry at piermont.com>, "Scott Bradner" <sob at harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Tired of Waiting
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler at iodesign.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 13:33:07 -0700
Cc: <discussion-draft at giaw.org>, <ietf at ietf.org>, <ifwp at ifwp.org>, <List at giaw.org>, <rmeyer at mhsc.com>
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 16:59:55 -0400
Reply-to: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler at iodesign.com>

>I actually believe in a fully open process. However, email is not
>structured to make that feasible. In a committee hearing, you can
>follow things like Roberts Rules of Order to make sure that giving
>everyone their say is orderly. In email, you can't do that, which
>means you can't operate a fully open process using only email.


I actually agree with Perry on this one, which is why I'm going well
out of my way to attend the meetings (DC, Geneva, etc). I feel we
make much more progress at these meetings than over the
lists. By far.

--
Christopher Ambler, Personal Opinion Only
--
NOTICE: The user of this email address is a resident of the State of 
Washington. Washington law provides for up to $500 per incident in
the case of Unsolicited Commercial Email (also known as spam).
This individual WILL file a complaint.

Prev by Date: Re: address portability
Next by Date: Re: Tired of Waiting
Previous by thread: Re: Tired of Waiting
Next by thread: Re: Tired of Waiting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Tired of Waiting

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.