![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
At 01:12 PM 7/16/98 -0400, John Charles Broomfield wrote:
>
>Hi Richard,
>
>> At 12:48 PM 7/16/98 -0400, John Charles Broomfield wrote:
>> >Well, if that is the case, and seeing that Chris can sell at $35/yr, with
>> >registrar AND registry integrated, why doesn't he divest from the registry
>> >part, just stick to the registrar part, and bundle in with CORE.
>>
>> Why doesnt CORE just use IOD instead of emergent?
>
>Well, IOD didn't try to get the contract up for grabs. I don't know when the
>contract goes "up for grabs" again, but at that time, IOD could easily try
>to get the contract. Of course, they'd have to understand that they don't
>*own* ".web" and could be outbidded next time around.
A lot of poeple don't think the CORE model is any good.
>> I suppose the answer is, Chris, like many of us feel
>> anybody should be allowed to buy a domain direclty
>> without *having* to go through a middleman that does
>> nothing except click on a web form anf mark it up
>> as a memebr of a club where dollars, not clues, are the
>> price of entry.
>
>If that's all that has to be done by the registrar, then why is Chris
>gouging (sp?) people for $35? Why is he getting a markup profit of $25 over
>his $10 cost for doing NOTHING? Anyone will tell you that a level of profit
>like that is something that will get looked at very closely if there's a
>monopoly situation (as Chris would like).
Below $35, you'll have runs on registries.
--
The most important thing in the programming language is the name. A
language will not succeed without a good name. I have recently invented
a very good name and now I am looking for a suitable language.
-- D. E. Knuth, 1967
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.