![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Simon Higgs wrote: > At 12:48 PM 7/16/98 -0400, John Charles Broomfield wrote: > > [ I argued that it was in IOD's interest to drop the registry and become > > a registrar under CORE] > > You've got it backwards. If IOD divested and became just the .WEB registry, > then the entire CORE cartel would be able to become .WEB registrars without > any legal challenge, or any cost or obligation to finance the registry > portion. This has been offered to the CORE leadership, and they turned it > down. > Of course, greed, stupidity, and sheer bloody-mindedness have not been > turned down. Hi Simon, economically (as far as making a fast buck) for the CORE bunch it would have probably made sense to accept the IOD proposition. Fortunately there is oversight to make sure that the CORE bunch can't act selfishly to the detriment of the registrants, and this would have been blatantly so. Yeah, IOD offers CORE to run ".web" under a "IT'S MINE AND YOU CAN'T LEAVE ME" agreement. How does that guarantee CORE to get the best possible service available? Where is the fear of competition going to push service of IOD up and price down? If the offer is "Hey, I'll run '.web' for you but will accept a yearly reopening of the contract so that bidders can offer to give better/cheaper service for the same registry", then that would probably be acceptable to POC/PAB. Oh, I nearly forgot... that's more or less the agreement with Emergent, so if Emergent gives lousy service, it would be dumped in favour of someone else with no loss of service to SLD holders. For a system of penalties to work, it has to be enforceable. If IOD says that ownership of ".web" is not negociable, then who's stopping them from holding registrars or registrants up for ransom no matter what contract IOD has signed? "Yeah, I signed this saying that I would keep the price down, but it was signed in the U.S. and now I've moved to Singapore and don't give a damn about that bit of paper, and as nobody can take ".web" away from me... And your renewal is now $1000 per month. So sue me". Yours, John.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.