Re: Ambler pretends to own .WEB again.

[Simon Higgs <simon at higgs.com>]

At 08:00 AM 7/17/98 -0400, Craig Simon wrote:

That's as bogus of an excuse as I've ever heard. The original IAHC archive
is deliberately misleading, and incomplete. There is no explanation that I
can find for the deliberate removal of the early posts (other than Brian
Carpenter's recommendation at the last IAB plenary to censor thoughts that
the IAB do not agree with).

But, at least I've now found this post from Klatu Nemron of Zorgoth B:

http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/03046.html

This message, at least, explains the disturbing condition of at least one
IAHC member.

And yes, Fred, this should give the IETF list a chuckle too.

;-) (that's for Hank)

>As of mid-1998 the authoritative IAHC archives were merged with the
gTLD-MoU's
>archive. 
>Check out http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/date.html
>
>Unfortunately, there is nothing at the original IAHC site that explains
this, so
>the charge of censorship comes up periodically. Remember, all of this becomes
>history. One of the (dubious?) virtues of archives is that they allow us to
>observe the sparring in the dot .web fight over and over again. 
>
>Sorry for the cross posting.
>
>Craig Simon
>
>Simon Higgs wrote:
>> 
>> I've been trying to find the public record of the
>> iahc-discuss list. It appears we have many reasons to doubt you. The list
>> appears to have been deliberately censored. So much for your accountability
>> Perry. Where are the posts for December 1996 and January 1997? The FIRST
>> message in the archive is from Don Heath saying
>> (http://www.iahc.org/iahc-discuss/00000.html) :
> 
>-snipped
> 
>> Where is the "large volume of submissions" and the previous months
discussion
>> archived??? Where is the IAHC's accountability? Where is your
accountability
>> Perry?
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Simon
>> 
>> --
>> ###
> 

Best Regards,

Simon

--
###