Re: Ambler pretends to own .WEB again.

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com>]

Simon and all,

Simon Higgs wrote:

> At 08:00 AM 7/17/98 -0400, Craig Simon wrote:
>
> That's as bogus of an excuse as I've ever heard. The original IAHC archive
> is deliberately misleading, and incomplete. There is no explanation that I
> can find for the deliberate removal of the early posts (other than Brian
> Carpenter's recommendation at the last IAB plenary to censor thoughts that
> the IAB do not agree with).

  Any comments by Craig or Robert Shaw on these points should not be suprising
in light of their "Connection" with the that Bob has with the IAHC-discuss
archives and Craigs inaccurate assertions that he is interest in these discussions

and debates form a purely observation standpoint as he is supposedly writing
a thesis paper.  If you review his own pages you will see that this does not
ring true

  It is also instructive to note that the IAHC was "Commissioned" by the IANA
according to Dave Crocker and their shall we say "Shell Game" activities with
respect to the IAB, NSI, and the ISOC as to the "Control" over the Root
servers and IP address allocations.  The pgMedia case will prove this out
very clearly.  See, http://www.technologylaw.com/pgmedia-reply.html.

>
>
> But, at least I've now found this post from Klatu Nemron of Zorgoth B:
>
> http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/03046.html
>
> This message, at least, explains the disturbing condition of at least one
> IAHC member.

  There seems to be a disturbing pattern that has been going on and on for some
time with these folks.

>
>
> And yes, Fred, this should give the IETF list a chuckle too.
>
> ;-) (that's for Hank)
>
> >As of mid-1998 the authoritative IAHC archives were merged with the
> gTLD-MoU's
> >archive.
> >Check out http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/date.html
> >
> >Unfortunately, there is nothing at the original IAHC site that explains
> this, so
> >the charge of censorship comes up periodically. Remember, all of this becomes
> >history. One of the (dubious?) virtues of archives is that they allow us to
> >observe the sparring in the dot .web fight over and over again.
> >
> >Sorry for the cross posting.
> >
> >Craig Simon
> >
> >Simon Higgs wrote:
> >>
> >> I've been trying to find the public record of the
> >> iahc-discuss list. It appears we have many reasons to doubt you. The list
> >> appears to have been deliberately censored. So much for your accountability
> >> Perry. Where are the posts for December 1996 and January 1997? The FIRST
> >> message in the archive is from Don Heath saying
> >> (http://www.iahc.org/iahc-discuss/00000.html) :
> >
> >-snipped
> >
> >> Where is the "large volume of submissions" and the previous months
> discussion
> >> archived??? Where is the IAHC's accountability? Where is your
> accountability
> >> Perry?
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >> --
> >> ###
> >
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Simon
>
> --
> ###

 Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com