Re: End to End QoS across the Internet

Subject: Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
From: "David W. Morris" <dwm at xpasc.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 19:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 23:25:42 -0400
In-reply-to: <g31zrj8rdv.fsf@bb.rc.vix.com>

On 18 Jul 1998, Paul Vixie wrote:

>...
> I'm carefully sidestepping the question "would it be cool to build priorities
> into the network" -- I think it would be.  But anyone who insists that "RSVP
> is required for IP telephony" has a higher quality cellular telephone than I
> have ever used, and/or thinks everyone else has such a cellular telephone.

Or perhaps they know what cellular technology is like and know it isn't
sufficient.  Cellular has no real competition, IP telephony does. The 
measure of sufficient quality will be regular long distance.

Dave Morris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
  - From: Tom Winters
- Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
  - From: Paul Vixie

References:
- Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
  - From: Paul Vixie

Prev by Date: Structuring IANA: A Few Questions to Be Answered
Next by Date: Re: Using IPv8 Addressing with IPv6
Previous by thread: Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
Next by thread: Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: End to End QoS across the Internet

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.