Re: End to End QoS across the Internet

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
From: Paul Vixie <vixie at vix.com>
Date: 19 Jul 1998 08:58:03 -0700
Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 12:10:19 -0400
In-reply-to: dwm@xpasc.com's message of 18 Jul 1998 20:59:53 -0700
References: <g31zrj8rdv.fsf@bb.rc.vix.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.980718192746.2611C-100000@shell1.aimnet.com>

> ... Cellular has no real competition, IP telephony does.

It does?

> The measure of sufficient quality will be regular long distance.

s/regular/flat rate/.

If you know of a distance insensitive long distance voice carrier
who is not using IP (specifically, IP over other people's networks)
then I would like to be told since I'd probably sign up for it.
-- 
Paul Vixie
La Honda, CA			"Many NANOG members have been around
<paul at vix.com>			 longer than most." --Jim Fleming
pacbell!vixie!paul		 (An H.323 GateKeeper for the IPv8 Network)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks

References:
- Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
  - From: Paul Vixie
- Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
  - From: David W. Morris

Prev by Date: Egonomics
Next by Date: RE: Using IPv8 Addressing with IPv6
Previous by thread: Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
Next by thread: Re: End to End QoS across the Internet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: End to End QoS across the Internet

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.