![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 19 Jul 1998 08:58:03 PDT, you said: > > ... Cellular has no real competition, IP telephony does. > > It does? > > > The measure of sufficient quality will be regular long distance. > > s/regular/flat rate/. > > If you know of a distance insensitive long distance voice carrier > who is not using IP (specifically, IP over other people's networks) > then I would like to be told since I'd probably sign up for it. Paul: For what it's worth, I remember seeing something in the Roanoke Times a few days ago, where Bell Atlantic was announcing the new/proposed (I'm not clear which) tariffs for long-distance 3rd-party, calling card, and so on, services, where the old tariff listed 1-25, 25-100, etc up to 450+ miles, and the new tariff was the same all the way down. I don't know if that was an announcement or proposal, and I don't think it applied to basic station-to-station LD rates. However, it's a start. ;) -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
Attachment:
pgp9Pg7rjNECA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.