RE: Egonomics
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Egonomics



Not trying to be paranoid about this, but a moderated conversation would
scare some of these folks here into thinking that there was some part of
the discussion that's missing/covered up.  I think we've all grown tired
of the flame wars recently, and I hope that we're all about used up on
this.

I know I have certain posters' incoming mail deleted automatically.  I
imagine I'm not the only one doing this.  Just let it drop, and someone
please start a new technical thread.  How about the merits of IPv6 & QoS
on large, high bandwidth delivery systems like Cable modems?

Eric Nay
Just lurking in the shadows...

-----Original Message-----
From: Austin Poulton [mailto:austin at rucus.ru.ac.za]
Sent: Monday, July 20, 1998 9:04 AM
To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Egonomics


>I think that that simplest answer is to have this
>list moderated by an IETF official. What could be
>an easier answer than that?
while one would think that we are all grown up enough not to have a
nanny -
it would appear from recent ieft posting that this is not the case
i say go for it

>Andrew M. Benhase
>Email:  abenhase at gte.net
>
>



Austin Poulton, MSc Student
Department of Computer Science
Rhodes University
P O Box 94
GRAHAMSTOWN 6140
South Africa
Email:      austin at rucus.ru.ac.za, csap at cs.ru.ac.za
Internet:  http://cs.ru.ac.za/homes/austin





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.