![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Not trying to be paranoid about this, but a moderated conversation would scare some of these folks here into thinking that there was some part of the discussion that's missing/covered up. I think we've all grown tired of the flame wars recently, and I hope that we're all about used up on this. I know I have certain posters' incoming mail deleted automatically. I imagine I'm not the only one doing this. Just let it drop, and someone please start a new technical thread. How about the merits of IPv6 & QoS on large, high bandwidth delivery systems like Cable modems? Eric Nay Just lurking in the shadows... -----Original Message----- From: Austin Poulton [mailto:austin at rucus.ru.ac.za] Sent: Monday, July 20, 1998 9:04 AM To: ietf at ietf.org Subject: Re: Egonomics >I think that that simplest answer is to have this >list moderated by an IETF official. What could be >an easier answer than that? while one would think that we are all grown up enough not to have a nanny - it would appear from recent ieft posting that this is not the case i say go for it >Andrew M. Benhase >Email: abenhase at gte.net > > Austin Poulton, MSc Student Department of Computer Science Rhodes University P O Box 94 GRAHAMSTOWN 6140 South Africa Email: austin at rucus.ru.ac.za, csap at cs.ru.ac.za Internet: http://cs.ru.ac.za/homes/austin
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.