![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
With the commercialization of the Internet, a wealth of publicly available information has come into being. Thus far now organization system has truly been defined in order to accommodate this. I believe that Scott's suggestion has substantial merit. An organization system needs to be adopted. Random Page Content Scans performed by search engines, or KEYWORDS are not sufficiently revealing. This is generally event from the results returned by most search query requests (which far to frequently return hundreds of results, only a small number which is useful to the user - if any). This situation is not improving as Index systems become tasked with more content. It is quite possible that the LOC system does not accommodate the entire wealth of information available on the Internet (eg. what is the LOC # to locate a regional car dealer), HOWEVER it is a very good start. And provides a base upon which new categories could be built. There are a number of professional organizations which represent the NEEDS of web Developers (HWG for example) who could be convinced to come on board with this, and provide a guide which web developers could use to determine how to properly categorize a page under the proposed system. A large number of web developers are utilizing software to assist in the page layout (FrontPage, NOF, etc.) The developers of these products could further be convinced to modify there application to assist the developer with this categorization. However before that would ever come to pass, a fully evolved system would have to be designed. I know that I would not start a major addition of a product based on a work in progress. This standardization will have to come from a respectable standards body, such as IETF and most likely (IETF with co-operation of W3C). With regards to the user needing to know the LOC (or Dewey) numbers, That is not necessary, the Search engine could be (and the successful ones will, if such a system existed) crafted to guide the user to the information they need. If you enter a good Metropolitan Library, you have a Card Catalog to help you (and instructions on how to use it). As web based search engines are interactive they could be designed to accommodate this with even greater facility. In summery.... Although, This will be a significant undertaking (in that the LOC or Dewey system would have to be grown to accommodate more that just stored knowledge, but also the wealth of opportunities available on todays internet), is almost certainly an NECISSARY undertaking and investment. It may be best for a small (unofficial committee) to be developed to begin organizing this, and present a refined specification to the IETF (and simultaneously to W3C) of what is being requested, and how best to accomplish it. I am interested pursuing this, and would like to find others that think it would be beneficial. I do understand that some may have objections to the utilization of time on this project, I would request that they reserve judgment and comment until a (informal specification could be developed, and then offer there input at that time.) All interested parties can contact me directly for further discussion and evaluation. Timothy Glenn Stockstill Chief Executive Officer Digital Republic Information Systems, Inc. mailto:timothy at stockstill.com PS [Scott]: if you like please e-mail me directly to discuss this further. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 8/26/98, at 1:02 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote: >On Sat, 22 Aug 1998 09:30:08 CDT, you said: >> I have a suggestion for how seperate the wheat from chaff during internet >> searches. Web page designers can simply say the word "Dewey" or "LOC" once >> on their page and follow it with the appropriate Dewey decimal system and/or > >Pop quiz time: > >(1) What's the Library of Congress number for an Ibanez Artist guitar? > >(2) How many hits does AltaVista produce for "Ibanez"? > >What is the likelyhood that (a) the producers of the pages in (2) will >actually add the LOC number to their pages (Hint: make a quick estimate >of what percentage of the pages are not at Ibanez.com) and (b) the >likelyhood that either the user or his Web browser will add the LOC >number to the search? > >It's basically the same "critical mass" problem that has been well >understood by the public health people ever since mass immunization >started. > > >-- > Valdis Kletnieks > Computer Systems Senior Engineer > Virginia Tech > > >-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- >Version: 2.6.2 > >iQCVAwUBNeF65dQBOOoptg9JAQGqwwP/RpOgryk2Jzo1Z07s6ZtjIBI+kghtFCj4 >YEiUIzQdzBvaMCQ6EtSxmOn1x7v6t9A/8FxEWgwSq+uBvNIX17ssIb/pmB9VHqBw >fjaolqnSJOpPo3aP8s3Zzv5cLpHbYNdocWHEkfEg3otIFnOvScFr9DdVnGmqEbQv >6oQVTV5jLfU= >=pWsl >-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.